What or where is our real sense of self?

  • Thread starter Metarepresent
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Self
In summary, there is no general consensus among experts in philosophy or cognitive neuroscience about the concept of the self. Questions about consciousness and the self have been ongoing, and the acquisition of knowledge is necessary to form a cohesive theory. Some essential questions that must be answered include the role of neural activity in consciousness, the nature of subjectivity, and how the self emerges. There are also issues that all theories of consciousness must address, such as binding, qualia, and the Cartesian Theatre. The theory of self-representation is appealing to some, as it posits that higher-order representations play a significant role in the origin of subjectivity. This is supported by the idea that metarepresentations, created by a second brain, allow humans to consciously
  • #71
Tregg Smith said:
Would a person with absolutely no memory have self?
You may wish to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Mistook_His_Wife_for_a_Hat" . Likely the best pop book on neuropsychologia ever. It mentions among other things the case of anterograde amnesia that Pythagorean and Apeiron mentionned, and discuss your question specifically (argue for a yes).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
And of course, amnesiacs can still learn implicit memories, since their basal ganglia are still in tact, though implicit memory are not conscious.

Parkinsons and Huntingtons patients, on the other hand, are associated with basal ganglia problems.

The two different kinds of damage are associated with different kinds of learning deficiencies, though amnesiacs are clearly the case for the more popular autobiographical memory.
 
Back
Top