What Philosophical Question Kicks Off Metaphysics 101?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the initial philosophical questions posed in introductory metaphysics courses, with a particular focus on the concept of time. Participants recall that their first tutorials often centered on whether time exists independently of change or if it is merely a continuous present. The variety of perspectives on this topic highlights its complexity. Some contributors mention that their introductory courses covered other foundational philosophical themes, such as epistemology and the nature of existence, with specific references to influential texts like Descartes' "Meditations on First Philosophy" and Robert Nozick's works. The question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" emerges as a significant philosophical inquiry that sparked interest among several participants. Additionally, the mention of Yale's popular course on death suggests a shift in introductory topics over the years, indicating that while time may be a classic subject, contemporary courses may explore different themes.
apeiron
Gold Member
Messages
2,138
Reaction score
2
Hey, anyone remember what was the first topic that got posed back in metaphysics 101?

It is many years ago now, but as I recall it, the very first tutorial I ever had was on the question of time.

Does it exist separate from change? Are we just part of a forever present moment or is there an actual flow from past to future? It was surprising how varied the views were.

So what philosophical question did they get you started on. And what question do they start people on these days if time is a rather old hat subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
apeiron said:
Hey, anyone remember what was the first topic that got posed back in metaphysics 101?

It is many years ago now, but as I recall it, the very first tutorial I ever had was on the question of time.

Does it exist separate from change? Are we just part of a forever present moment or is there an actual flow from past to future? It was surprising how varied the views were.

So what philosophical question did they get you started on. And what question do they start people on these days if time is a rather old hat subject?

Hah, I like the change of pace with this one :smile:. Metaphysics definitely wasn't a 100 level course! In philosophy 101, which was a survey course, we went through Louis Pojman's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195171500/?tag=pfamazon01-20, which starts off with a little epistemology. Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy was one of the first readings. I remember this one now because we ended up going over it in four different courses. We talked about induction and solipsism etc. His arguments for God were also fodder for some critical logical analysis.

Actually, we didn't even have a course called "Metaphysics." There were courses on rationalism and empiricism... logic, ethics, etc. The closest course was probably philosophy of mind, if that answers your question in a different way.

The question that first got me interested in philosophy was "why is there something rather than nothing?" I was studying thermodynamics in high school, and all of the physics seemed to be saying that nature tends towards equilibrium and heat death. The whole idea that anything was happening (or existing) just made absolutely no sense. My intro philosophy professor recommended Robert Nozick's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0674664795/?tag=pfamazon01-20, which I recommend for beginning philosophers (after some other introduction).

Yale offers Death as an interesting and popular introductory course (http://oyc.yale.edu/philosophy).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You could be right that it was not called metaphysics. This was back in about 1973.

I only did the one intro course as a relief from science (bio and psych). Descartes was the focus, though Berkeley was more fun and Locke more appealing.

Actually it was a one-off guest lecture on philosophy of science and the implications of thermodynamics that was about the only official highlight of my entire time at university. That and a little bit about catastrophe theory.

Why nothing rather than something was also the most exhilarating initial question.

Influential book was probably Melvyn Konner's The Tangled Wing - philosophy for a bio-psych kid.
 
"In 2013, after a series of hospitalizations due to magnets, New Zealand government officials permanently banned the sale of those made from neodymium-iron-boron (NIB)." https://www.sciencealert.com/new-zealand-teen-loses-part-of-his-bowel-after-swallowing-nearly-200-magnets "A 13-year-old boy in New Zealand has had part of his bowel surgically removed after he ingested nearly 200 high-powered magnets. (2025)" OK, this teen was a fool, but it is not always a teen, it is not always...
Thread 'RIP Chen Ning Yang (1922-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Chen-Ning ( photo from http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~yang/ ) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/science/chen-ning-yang-dead.html https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxrzzk02plo https://www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk/en/press/mourning-professor-yang-chen-ning/ https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/physics/about/awards_and_prizes/_nobel_and_breakthrough_prizes/_profiles/yangc https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/physics/people/_profiles/yangc...

Similar threads

Back
Top