MHB What point does the spiral converge to?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the convergence point of a spiral defined by a sequence of movements starting from the origin. The movements consist of alternating directions with decreasing distances, leading to a complex series for the X coordinate. Participants explore the relationship between this series and the power series of the cosine function. It is concluded that the spiral converges to the point X = cos(1). This mathematical exploration highlights the connection between geometric sequences and trigonometric functions.
amr21
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Starting from the origin, go one unit east, then the same distance north, then (1/2) of the previous distance west, then (1/3)
of the previous distance south, then (1/4) of the previous distance east, and so on. What point does this 'spiral' converge to?


I have attempted to sketch this out but not sure how to work out what point it converges to. I know that it is somewhere between n/2 and 7n/12 (after 6 moves from the origin). The fractions are getting smaller but is there an easy way to work out at what point it converges?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
amr21 said:
Starting from the origin, go one unit east, then the same distance north, then (1/2) of the previous distance west, then (1/3)
of the previous distance south, then (1/4) of the previous distance east, and so on. What point does this 'spiral' converge to?


I have attempted to sketch this out but not sure how to work out what point it converges to. I know that it is somewhere between n/2 and 7n/12 (after 6 moves from the origin). The fractions are getting smaller but is there an easy way to work out at what point it converges?

Hi amr21,

Looking at the X coordinate, we have:
$$X=1-\frac 12 + \left(\frac 12 \cdot\frac 13 \cdot\frac 14\right) - \left(\frac 12 \cdot\frac 13 \cdot\frac 14 \cdot\frac 15 \cdot\frac 16\right) + ...$$
This looks a bit like the power series of the cosine:
$$\cos x = 1 - \frac 1{2!} x^2 + \frac 1{4!} x^4 - ...$$
Can we find an $x$ to match them? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi amr21,

Looking at the X coordinate, we have:
$$X=1-\frac 12 + \left(\frac 12 \cdot\frac 13 \cdot\frac 14\right) - \left(\frac 12 \cdot\frac 13 \cdot\frac 14 \cdot\frac 15 \cdot\frac 16\right) + ...$$
This looks a bit like the power series of the cosine:
$$\cos x = 1 - \frac 1{2!} x^2 + \frac 1{4!} x^4 - ...$$
Can we find an $x$ to match them? (Wondering)

That makes sense, thank you! Could you explain further on how to find an x to match them?
 
amr21 said:
That makes sense, thank you! Could you explain further on how to find an x to match them?

We should match $-\frac 12$ with $-\frac 1{2!}x^2$, implying that $x^2=1$, which means that $x=1$ will do the trick.
It means that the spiral ends at $X=\cos(1)$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top