What should be the influence of the imaginary part on a complex number?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the influence of the imaginary part of a complex number in a simulation model where the input is a complex number representing stiffness and damping coefficients. The user, Ila, observes that varying the real part (stiffness) and the imaginary part (damping) yields the same results, which raises questions about expected behavior. Responses clarify that the imaginary part typically represents phase or rotation in the complex plane, while the real part indicates amplitude. Despite this, Ila expects distinct outcomes when adjusting stiffness and damping independently. The conversation highlights the complexities of modeling material properties using complex numbers.
pseudorandom
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

What should be the influence of the imaginary part on a complex number?

I am asking because I am running a simulation model where the input is a complex number; say z=a+ib
Now the problem is that I get the same result when I put a=0 and give some high value to b, as when I do the vice-versa.

Should this behaviour be expected?

I look forward to a reply. Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Ila
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure your question is too general to be given a meaningful reply. What sort of simulation is it? What, specifically, is the input modeling? As far as I understand, the imaginary part of a complex number refers to a quantity of rotation around the complex plane, where the real part refers to the radius of said rotation. Though even this description is likely insufficient.
 
Hey! Thanks for your reply. The input is the stiffness and damping coefficients of a material. And youre right; the stiffness corresponds to the amplitude and damping to the phase of the resulting vibrations.
I would expect different results if I change the stiffness and the damping of a material separately. But here i get the same result.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top