What Type of Signal is x(t) in Parseval's Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jiho
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In Parseval's Theorem, the signal x(t) can be any complex or real-valued function for which the continuous Fourier transform exists. It is commonly interpreted as representing voltage or current signals, where the theorem relates to the total energy of the signal. The discussion raises concerns about interpreting x(t) as a power signal, questioning how power squared could equate to power due to differing units. The consensus is that while x(t) can technically represent power, this interpretation complicates the usual energy-based understanding of the theorem. Ultimately, the most straightforward application of Parseval's Theorem pertains to voltage or current signals.
Jiho
Messages
20
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


In parseval's theorm, what is type of x(t)?? I mean.. is this voltage wave? or power wave?

Homework Equations


upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png
    upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 822
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically, ##x(t)## can be any function ##x:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}## that is any complex valued function over the real line (or as a sub case any real valued function over the real line ##x:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}##) for which its continuous Fourier transform ##X(f)## exists . So it can be a function representing the (complex) voltage between two nodes of a circuit or the power between two nodes of a circuit.

However the usual interpretation of this theorem in signal analysis is that the two sides of the equation are just two different ways of computing the total energy of a signal ##x(t)## (a voltage or a current signal).
 
  • Like
Likes Jiho
you mentioned it doesn't matter that signal x(t) represents voltage or power. But I can't understand if x(t) represent power,
upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
this equation doesn't make sense as I think. In my opinion, How can power^2 be just power?? Unit of dimension is not same as I know.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-17_16-23-45.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-23-45.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 350
  • upload_2019-1-17_16-23-51.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-23-51.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 354
  • upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 530
Yes I said that ##x(t)## can be any function for which the Fourier transform exists. However I also said that the usual interpretation is that of energy (the integrals in both sides represent energy) in the case ##x(t)## is a voltage or current signal. If ##x(t)## is a power signal then we can't give that usual interpretation of energy to this theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes Jiho
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top