What Unique Properties Define a Cyclic Quadrilateral?

AI Thread Summary
A cyclic quadrilateral is defined by the ability to inscribe a circle through its four vertices. It possesses unique properties, such as satisfying Ptolemy's theorem, which relates the lengths of its sides and diagonals. Additionally, the sum of each pair of opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral equals 180 degrees. Non-cyclic quadrilaterals do not meet these criteria, highlighting their distinct geometric characteristics. Understanding these properties is crucial for solving related mathematical proofs.
Saad
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Here's an interesting question which is related to proofs, one of the hardest chapters of math:

If a circle can be drawn to pass through the 4 vertices of a Quadrilateral, we call this a "cyclic quadrilateral". What special properties do you think a cyclic quadrilateral has that wouldn't be true for any other quadrilateral?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just a quick guess: Right or acute angles?

cookiemonster
 
A cyclic quadrilateral satisfies Ptolemaios' theorem, which states, for vertices A,B,C,D:
AC*BD=AB*CD +BC*AD
(AC and BD diagonals)

I don't think non-cyclic quadrilaterals satisfy Pt. th.
 
Sum of every opposite pair of angles is π?
 
This smells like a question from a take-home test...
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top