What were the first applications of quantum mechanics to technology?

mjpam
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
This thread is primarily the history of quantum mechanics, so I am not sure if it is appropriate for this forum.

I understand that most of the foundational experiments in quantum mechanics were done in the first two or three decades of the 20th century. As far as I can remember, it is hard to explain semiconductor band gap theory without appealing to quantum mechanics, so the development of the solid state transistor required the quantum mechanics to occur.

Is there another technology that applies quantum mechanics that was developed earlier than the transistor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill_K said:
X-ray machines

X-rays were discover before the formalization of quantum mechanics, though.
 
I'd say the transistor.
 
mjpam said:
Is there another technology that applies quantum mechanics that was developed earlier than the transistor?

I would say quantum mechanics was applied earlier than that to electronic microscopy, as quantum effects determine the ultimate resolution of this imaging technology.
 
I would say atomic fission was harnessed solely by the use of the quantum theory of physics (Nuclear weapons, thermonuclear power).
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Back
Top