I What's left to see of the early Universe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the potential for further exploration of the early universe, particularly through low-frequency radio astronomy before reaching the 'opaque universe' boundary. The James Webb Telescope and gravitational wave detectors like LIGO are key tools for observing cosmic phenomena. Researchers aim to investigate the "dark ages," a period filled with neutral hydrogen gas, by examining the hydrogen 21cm line. Ongoing projects such as DARE and LOFAR are focused on probing density fluctuations in the universe's expansion. The conversation emphasizes that significant discoveries about the early universe remain possible.
SimplePrimate
In the detection of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation I understand there's still some low frequency radio astronomy left to do before hitting the 'opaque universe' boundary where/when light could not propagate. What, if anything, can we still hope see?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The James Webb Telescope will allow us to see better up to the limit and Gravitational Wave detectors such as LIGO will let us look through it. We are looking to see as far back in time as we can. And I don't think we will run out of things to discover in any of our life times.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and pinball1970
I think what you are referring to is the following. There is a period after the emission of the CMB, and before the formation of the first stars, that is referred to as the "dark ages". During this time the universe was filled with cooling neutral hydrogen gas, with some helium as well. It is possible to probe this time by looking at the hydrogen 21cm line with low frequency radio telescopes. There are a number of efforts trying to do that, such as DARE, LOFAR, and others.

As to what we hope to see, ideally we can probe the density fluctuations of the universe as it expanded, and see if they agree with existing models.
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
  • Like
Likes Imager and 256bits
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
393
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
103
Views
10K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top