What's the Best Introductory Calculus-Based Physics Textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyptonite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Textbooks
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for introductory calculus-based physics textbooks. Halliday and Resnick (editions 1 and 2) are mentioned as notable options, though not preferred by all. Kleppner and Kolenkow's "An Introduction to Mechanics" is recognized for its challenging content and excellent problem sets, making it suitable for honors courses but potentially difficult for self-learners. Purcell's "Electricity and Magnetism" is praised for its readability and problem quality, often used in honors classes. French's "Vibrations and Waves" is noted as a future resource for one participant. The MIT course materials, including professor notes and additional problems, are highlighted as valuable supplements. Gasioschwicz's text is mentioned but not favored, while Serway is acknowledged for providing a solid foundation in introductory physics. Tipler is advised against. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of problem-solving and teaching style in selecting a physics textbook.
Kyptonite
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What do you consider to be the "best" introductory calculus-based physics textbook? I've taken an Honors Physics course which used the highly pedestrian algebra-based Holt Physics book and am greatly interested in learning more physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Halliday and Resnick, not the versions with Krane, i.e. Editions 1 or 2 only...
 
When I was a TA for an honors sequence, they used [over the span of 3 quarters]:
Kleppner and Kolenkow "An Introduction to Mechanics",
Purcell "Electricity and magnetism (Berkeley physics course v.2)",
and [if I recall correctly] French "Vibrations and Waves".
 
the series robphy posted is the one that MIT uses. K&K and purcell are used in the honors physics classes. K&K is probably not the best introduction to the material, especially for self-teaching, but the problems are excellent and there are a lot of examples. i found the purcell to be pretty good and readable, with some good problems. a good supplement can be found at my class's website at http://web.mit.edu/8.022/www/ - my prof's notes and extra problems are excellent. before attending MIT, i had never done any calculus-based physics, and found the K&K a bit hard to keep up with. second semester, i found the E&M class which used purcell to be much easier. however, the prof was definitely a big factor, so take that with a grain of salt. and having used those two books, i decided on becoming a physics and math major, so take that as an indicator of their great treatment of the subject matter. as for the french, that's what i will be using next year, so we'll see about that i guess?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been using a text by Gasioschwicz (sp.). Personally, I don't care much for the book. Lots of worked examples, however. This text is calculus based, by the way.
 
I learned a lot of intro physics from Serway.

Avoid Tipler.
 
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
590
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top