What's the Verdict on "Quant-ph/9905077"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter martinbn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The paper "Quant-ph/9905077" discusses the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics and its associated Measurement Problem, proposing a mathematical extension to resolve these paradoxes. It introduces a framework for interacting systems using a singular toroidal bundle over the Hilbert sphere, which allows for a consistent statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. The authors claim that this approach leads to a unique convex partition that yields accurate probabilities in quantum mechanics. There is confusion regarding the paper's date, as it is marked 2008 despite being submitted in 1999; this discrepancy is explained by the LaTeX system used for generating the PDF. Overall, the discussion centers on the implications of this paper for understanding quantum mechanics and its interpretations.
martinbn
Science Advisor
Messages
4,333
Reaction score
2,395
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the abstract:

"The Copenhagen Interpretation describes individual systems, using the same Hilbert space formalism as does the statistical ensemble interpretation (SQM). This leads to the well-known paradoxes surrounding the Measurement Problem. We extend this common mathematical structure to encompass certain natural bundles with connections over the Hilbert sphere S. This permits a consistent extension of the statistical interpretation to interacting individual systems, thereby resolving these paradoxes.

Suppose V is a physical system in interaction with another system W. The state vector of V+W has a set of polar decompositions with a vector q of complex coefficients. These are parameterized by the right toroid T of amplitudes q, and comprise a singular toroidal bundle over S, which comprises the enlarged state space of V+W. We prove that each T has a unique natural convex partition yielding the correct SQM probabilities. In the extended theory V and W synchronously assume pure spectral states according to which member of the partition contains q. The apparent indeterminism of SQM is thus attributable to the effectively random distribution of initial phases. "


This has a date on the paper of 2008, which is confusing because the submission history does not list a revision after 1999. I see that occasionally, not sure what it signifies exactly.
 
DrChinese said:
This has a date on the paper of 2008, which is confusing because the submission history does not list a revision after 1999. I see that occasionally, not sure what it signifies exactly.
It has to do with how LaTeX and arXiv work. LaTeX prints a date corresponding to the date at which the PDF was produced from the LaTeX source. Thus, the printed date (2008 in this case) corresponds to the date at which PDF was produced from the LaTeX source. The LaTeX source itself may have been submitted to arXiv at a much earlier time.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K