When Does a Beam Start to Behave Like a String Under Tension?

AI Thread Summary
A beam cannot behave like a string due to its ability to support both tension and compression, while a string only supports tension. The transition point where a beam starts to act like a string occurs when sufficient tension is applied to eliminate all compression within the beam. This requires calculating the force difference between the top and bottom of the beam based on its dimensions and loading conditions. The stress in a beam under axial tension and bending is complex and does not equate to simple string tension. Understanding this behavior involves examining combined axial and bending stresses in structural engineering literature.
Excom
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hallo

I have been thinking about when beam starts to behave like string.

My questions are: How much tension do you need to put on a beam before it starts to behave like a string? And when does the behaviour become purely string like?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A beam can never behave like a string.

A string can only support tension; it cannot support compression. This is fundamental.

It is also fundamental to beam action that there is both tension and compression.

So anything capable of acting as a beam can support compression and cannot be a string.
 
Excom said:
Hallo
I have been thinking about when beam starts to behave like string.

My questions are: How much tension do you need to put on a beam before it starts to behave like a string? And when does the behaviour become purely string like?

The beam acts as a beam when the upper half is under compression, and the bottom half is under tension.

If you take a long enough section of beam, and you can apply enough tension, then there will be a tension level where no part of the beam is under compression any more.

My hunch is that you would need to compute the force difference between top and bottom. Given a particular length of the beam, a particular mass per length unit, and a particular height of the beam you can compute how much force difference there must be between top and bottom of the beam.
Then you have the amount of tension that must be applied at the ends so that there is no longer any compression in the beam.
 
Cleonis you are quite correct that you can eliminate the compressions by 'prestressing'

The beam loading then becomes one of combined axial tension plus bending moment.

For a simply supported beam, breadth b and depth d, loaded at the most stressful section (the middle) by a point load Q and under an axial tension P the stress at any point A in the beam is given by

{S_A} = \frac{P}{{bd}} \pm \frac{{6M}}{{b{d^2}}} = \frac{1}{{bd}}\left\{ {\frac{P}{1} \pm \frac{{6Qx}}{{2d}}} \right\}

We can certainly calculate the point at which the prestress just eliminates the compression, but since the moment varies with distance, x along the beam, from zero at the support to a max at the load point, this can only occur at one section at a time.

Equally the equation is nothing like the simple tension in a string. So I will leave it up to otheres to decide if this is 'string action' or not.
 
Thanks for the answers.

Do any of you know some literature about the subject?
 
Look up combined axial and bending stresses

Here for instance

http://shjwc.sau.edu.cn/jpk/cllx/50/4/Chapter%208-Combined%20Bending%20Stresses.doc

Note download the target and rename to docx.

read paragraph 8.2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Back
Top