- #71
- 28,059
- 19,576
This thread is 70 posts long and you've made no progress. I'm sorry that I'm not able to help you.PMNIMG said:Could you explain it with more details?
This thread is 70 posts long and you've made no progress. I'm sorry that I'm not able to help you.PMNIMG said:Could you explain it with more details?
Please explain about thisPeroK said:I highly recommend using Kepler's third law. It gives you a quick way to get a good approximation. The answer will be the time to fall to the centre of a planet, and not to its surface. The difference should be small if the object falls from far enough away.
In that case, every single post that has been made so far in this thread is irrelevant to your question. That includes all the posts you have asked people to explain. Kepler's Third Law is irrelevant. The free fall time from the altitude of Phobos is irrelevant. The equations you wrote in the OP are irrelevant.PMNIMG said:so, it is (b). About Phobos