MHB When the capacitor have 94% of its final voltage.

AI Thread Summary
To determine the time required to charge a 140 pF capacitor through a 77.0 MΩ resistor to 94% of its final voltage, the exponential charging formula is applied. The final voltage is denoted as V∞, and the voltage at time t is expressed as V(t) = V∞(1-e^(-t/RC)). When V(t) equals 0.94V∞, the equation simplifies to (1-e^(-t/RC)) = 0.94. By using logarithms, the time t can be calculated based on the RC time constant, which is 0.000108 seconds. The discussion emphasizes the correct interpretation of resistance values and the application of logarithmic functions in solving the problem.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everybody,

Using the exact exponential treatment, find how much time (in s) is required to charge an initially uncharged 140 pF capacitor (C) through a 77.0 M[FONT=&quot]Ω resistor (R) to 94.0% of its final voltage ($\varepsilon$).

Work:
C=140 pF=1.4x10^-10
R=77.0 Mohm=7.7x10^5
$q(t)=C\varepsilon(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})$ or $I(t)=\frac{\varepsilon}{R}e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}$
RC=.000108

What am I missing?
.94*C or what is the battery?

Thanks
Carter Barker
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everybody,

Using the exact exponential treatment, find how much time (in s) is required to charge an initially uncharged 140 pF capacitor (C) through a 77.0 M resistor (R) to 94.0% of its final voltage ($\varepsilon$).

Work:
C=140 pF=1.4x10^-10
R=77.0 Mohm=7.7x10^5
$q(t)=C\varepsilon(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})$ or $I(t)=\frac{\varepsilon}{R}e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}$
RC=.000108

What am I missing?
.94*C or what is the battery?

Thanks
Carter Barker

Hi Carter,

Note first that $77\,\text{M$\Omega$}$ is $77\times10^6 = 7.7\times10^7$.

The voltage has the form $V(t) = V_\infty(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})$, where $V_\infty$ is is the final voltage, corresponding to $t\to\infty$. $V(t)$ will be equal to $0.94V_\infty$ when $(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}) = 0.94$.

You can easily compute the corresponding value of $t$ using logarithms.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top