- #71
I had a similar experience but in reverse order. I was in the Los Angeles school district, and a program combined 7 high schools with each one specializing in a few subjects. In 1967, we got a MonRobot with a drum memory, paper tape input and a language called quickcomp. In 1968, that computer went to Beverly Hills High School and we got an IBM 1130 with card reader, card punch, line printer, typewriter / keyboard console, and toggle switch / display panel. It mostly ran Fortran IV, and some assembly language, plus occasional runs with APL. There were also Saturday classes at the IBM data center in downtown LA, using an IBM 360/25 or 360/30. For me, the most impressive device at the data center was the 1200+ line per minute 1403 model 3 "train" line printer.sandy stone said:The first computer I ever laid hands on was an IBM 1130, as part of an experimental educational program for high schoolers. About a year after that, I actually got to run a program on a 1950's computer that used magnetic drum memory(!).
Per this wikipedia article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_TMS9900, the CPU was a 16-bit processor, with three internal registers that were 16 bits wide. One of the registers contained the address of 16 general purpose registers in RAM, with each of these being 16 bits. Perhaps these are what you're referring to as a 256-byte CPU. The normal way of doing things is to describe a CPU by the size of each of its registers, not the total number of bits in all of the registers.Chronos said:my first real home boole was a TI-99/4A. It was state of the art with a mind boggling 256 byte cpu
What, don't tell me your first computer was a smartphone? (If you're young ... no problem with that.)lekh2003 said:I feel like an odd one out, everybody here has first computers from the time when computers were classified as items which did calculations
No... I'm not that young. My first computer was a computer from the days when Toshiba reigned the computer market. Smartphones were still yet to arrive to the world affordablyStavros Kiri said:What, don't tell me your first computer was a smartphone? (If you're young ... no problem with that.)
[Smartphones, tablets, phablets, ipods and ipads have actually advanced computers built-in ...]
Which brings up the question: which one we take as the definition of 'computer'?
Simply having microprocessors and a CPU or programming ability? [With relevant softwear]
For example, my almost first cell phone (around 1994, the smallest NEC back then ...) was it a "computer" or not? I assume not, because it had no programming ability. But smartphones, or even earlier generation cell phones (~after 2000) [2G, and 2005 3G ...], are/were clearly programmable, accepting downloaded apps, even connection to the internet, YouTube (the 3G ones), etc. . Smartphones are just the most advanced programmable cell phones, accepting in a simplified manner downloaded apps from a store, which gives you the ability to modulate them by yourself. In my opinion, these are clearly computers too.
Oklekh2003 said:No... I'm not that young. My first computer was a computer from the days when Toshiba reigned the computer market. Smartphones were still yet to arrive to the world affordably
A couple of years after I had bought an Apple //e, I got a Commodore Amiga. You could also get PC DOS emulation software + 5 1/4" drive, which I used to run a DOS-based C compiler. The simplest program I could write, with a minimum of #include files, would take a full minute just to compile.Nik_2213 said:One curious feature of the Arc was that it could emulate a DOS PC in software. Read low-density 3½" PC disks, run programs at about 10% of 'native'. I used this facility to learn the rudiments of QuickBasic and Q-Basic for work. One of the PC cover disks I got included a 'System Reporter'. On a whim, I fed it to the Arc.
Me too. I've moved to PC 's since 2010. Besides price, compatibility is what made me totally against Apple (pretty much, more or less ...). Not even an i-phone, although they may be good.Mark44 said:and because a PC clone was half the price of a comparable Mac, I decided against getting a Mac, and haven't owned one since.
About that time, soon after I started graduate school, I bought its non-programmable sibling, the HP21c. I didn't think it was worth spending the extra money for programmability. It seemed kind of wimpy compared to the physics department's PDP-10, on which I was doing FORTRAN programming for my HEP research group.Laurie K said:I forgot that I also had a HP25c programmable calculator in 1977 so that technically was my first computer.
Ah, FORTRAN. When I learned FORTRAN is was presented as a Math department class. There wasn't such a thing as Computer Science back then.jtbell said:It seemed kind of wimpy compared to the physics department's PDP-10, on which I was doing FORTRAN programming for my HEP research group.
I hear that. I bought the Okidata Microline 390 with my first PC and it's still working on my weather station PC.jack action said:It just won't let go (unlike all subsequent cheap ink jet printers that came afterward).
Lol... I never thought ours sounded that bad... .Laurie K said:LOL, when dot matrix printers sounded like personal sawmills...
Oh no! No! We know, we know! ...Laurie K said:Just in case you don't know what a dot matrix printer sounds like.
Laurie K said:Just in case you don't know what a dot matrix printer sounds like.
Laurie K said:Just in case you don't know what a dot matrix printer sounds like.