Where Did the Energy Come From? A Physics Puzzle on Entropy and Magnetism

  • Thread starter Thread starter luthier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of magnets spontaneously organizing into a structured block when placed in a bag, raising the question of where the energy comes from to decrease entropy. It highlights the principle that reducing entropy typically requires energy input. One participant explains that the magnetic field itself stores energy, and when magnets come together, the net magnetic field's energy decreases. This energy change occurs due to the work done on or by the magnets as they are moved closer together. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted acknowledgment of the complexity of the topic.
luthier
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
First off, I may or may not know the correct answer to this one...
Here it is..

I have a set of say 100 small perminent magnets which are randomly oriented
in space. I also have an empty burlap sack. I grab each of the magnets one at
a time and throw each one into the bag until all 100 are in the bag.
I then look inside the bag to find that all 100 magnets have attached themselves
to one another to form a single well ordered block of 100.

Remember that there is a law which states that in order to lower entropy you
must add energy in order to "pay" for the decrease in entropy.
The magnets went from a maximum entropy state to one of nearly the most ordered
orientation. Where did the energy come from to lower the entropy ?

Tim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic field stores energy. When two bar magnets come together (or any set of magnetic dipoles) the resulting net magnetic field is weaker in the amount of energy stored than the fields produced when the two magnets are apart. The energy injected or extracted from the fields is the work done on or by the magnets when they are physically moved in the vicinity of each other.
 
Ok, I guess I will have to come up with a better one ! :-)
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top