Where does the formula for dtheta in polar coordinates come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moose352
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The formula for dtheta in polar coordinates is derived using the relationships x = r cos(theta) and y = r sin(theta). By differentiating these expressions, one can express theta as a function of x and y. The derivation involves calculating the changes in angle (delta theta) resulting from small changes in x and y, forming right triangles to relate these changes to the radius r. The discussion emphasizes that a positive change in x results in a negative change in theta, leading to the formula dtheta = (x dy - y dx) / (x^2 + y^2). Visual aids can enhance understanding, particularly in illustrating the relationships between the segments and angles involved.
Moose352
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
For this diagram: http://ananth.ath.cx/coag.jpg

The textbook gives the formula for dtheta as (x*dy-y*dx) / (x^2 + y^2) assuming that r' ~ r. How is this formula derived?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The easiest way is to use polar coordinates:

x = r \cos \theta
y = r \sin \theta

From these you can express theta as a function of x and y, and then differentiate both sides of the equation. You can also find this formula directly from the diagram by first calculating the \Delta \theta_1 that arises from \Delta x, and then \Delta \theta_2 that arises from \Delta y. The add them to get \Delta \theta. Note that a positive delta x decreases the angle (\Delta \theta_1 is negative). But in the diagram delta x looks (slightly?) negative.
 
Last edited:
Thanks PBRMEASAP!

But I'm a bit confused by the second part. You write that i can simply add theta1 and theta2 together to find theta. How exactly do I find the theta1 and theta2 that arise from dx and dy?
 
Well, it's hard to describe without a visual aid, but I don't know how to put up a picture that isn't too large a file (I tried to post something I drew in Paint one time and it wouldn't take it).

For the delta x part, draw a picture where r' only differs from r by a small delta x (delta y = 0). Draw the little segment of length delta x that connects the end of r to end of r'. Now draw another small segment from the end of r so that it intersects r' at 90 deg. You now have formed a little right triangle with delta x as the hypotenuse. And the length of that last little segment you drew is r \Delta \theta (approximately).

Now here's the trick. Say that r makes an angle theta (not delta theta) with the x-axis. Then so does r', approximately, since it only differs from r by a small x displacement. Then by alternate interior angles, r' makes an angle theta with the little delta x segment (still with me? :-)). Now you can see that the segment of length r \Delta \theta is equal in magnitude to \Delta x \ \sin \theta. Looking at the picture, you can see that the sign of delta theta is negative, so we get

\Delta \theta = -\frac{\Delta x \sin \theta}{r} = -\frac{y \Delta x}{r^2}

The contribution from delta y is found the same way. Were you able to get the answer from polar coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top