Which ball travels further, up a ramp or thrown in the air

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexstrasza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Ball Ramp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the distances traveled by two identical balls, one thrown up a frictionless ramp and the other thrown into the air, both at the same angle and initial velocity. It concludes that the ball on the ramp travels further due to the ramp providing support, which helps convert kinetic energy into potential energy more effectively. The mechanical energy of the ball on the ramp is conserved since there is no friction, and the normal force does not do work. The participants express confusion about how to apply energy conservation principles and the differences in distance traveled versus displacement. Ultimately, the ramp's support allows the ball to reach a greater height compared to the ball thrown in the air.
Alexstrasza
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two identical balls, one is thrown at angle α up a frictionless surface, the other one is thrown at the same angle up in the air.

Both have the same initial velocity.

A. Which one travels further? Explain.
B. Is the mechanical energy of the first ball conserved? Explain.

Homework Equations



F=ma
K(e)=mv^2/2, P(e)=m*g*h
Momentum... p=m*v
W=Fa

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
A. I am having trouble with this one.

I tried to use v(f)=v(i)+2ax but then it is the same equation for both the balls. That can't be right?

I think that the ball in the air would travel the shorter distance, because it doesn't have the support of the ramp.

B. The energy of the first ball is conserved, because there is no friction and the only force except gravity working on that ball is N, which doesn't do work because it's perpendicular.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexstrasza said:
I tried to use v(f)=v(i)+2ax but then it is the same equation for both the balls. That can't be right?
What are the accelerations for the two balls? Are they the same?
What is x, and how does that equation work if you have to consider two dimensions?
Alexstrasza said:
I think that the ball in the air would travel the shorter distance, because it doesn't have the support of the ramp.
There is also a different effect in the opposite direction.
Alexstrasza said:
B. The energy of the first ball is conserved, because there is no friction and the only force except gravity working on that ball is N, which doesn't do work because it's perpendicular.
Is it really perpendicular?
What exactly counts as mechanical energy?
 
  • Like
Likes Alexstrasza
I'm not sure what is meant by "travel further". Horizontal distance? Height?
 
  • Like
Likes Alexstrasza
The "Range" equation will quickly give you the distance the ball in air will travel.
Now if the initial kinetic energy is converted to potential energy,
how far can the ball travel on the incline?
 
  • Like
Likes Alexstrasza
Thanks for the replies everyone. Sorry for late update.

The question was asking to find which ball will reach the maximum height. I tried to solve using energy conservation but then it gives me the same solution for both.

mfb said:
Is it really perpendicular?
What exactly counts as mechanical energy?

Isn't N always perpendicular to the surface? Energy = initial velocity squared x mass / 2 and energy is conserved.

J Hann said:
The "Range" equation will quickly give you the distance the ball in air will travel.
Now if the initial kinetic energy is converted to potential energy,
how far can the ball travel on the incline?

That is what I am confused about, what is the difference between how far the ball travels up an incline vs. at an angle in the air. I am pretty sure that the incline "helps" the ball but not sure how to express it.
 
Alexstrasza said:
The question was asking to find which ball will reach the maximum height.
Ah, now the question makes sense.

Alexstrasza said:
I tried to solve using energy conservation but then it gives me the same solution for both.
Describe what you did for each. They are not quite the same.

Hint: What's the speed of each ball when it reaches maximum height?
 
As Doc Al implied, consider the "total" energy at the top of the trajectory for each case.
 
Alexstrasza said:
I tried to solve using energy conservation but then it gives me the same solution for both.
Energy is not the only conserved quantity that is relevant for the freely falling ball.
Alexstrasza said:
Isn't N always perpendicular to the surface?
The force from the surface is, the force from gravity is not.
 
J Hann said:
The "Range" equation will quickly give you the distance the ball in air will travel.
Now if the initial kinetic energy is converted to potential energy,
how far can the ball travel on the incline?
No. It will not give distance traveled.

It will only give the displacement.
 
  • #10
Alexstrasza said:
B. The energy of the first ball is conserved, because there is no friction and the only force except gravity working on that ball is N, which doesn't do work because it's perpendicular.
Quite so, the normal force does no work. But forces acting on an object can transfer the energy of an object from one form to another without doing any net work. E.g. when a ball rolls down a slope, the friction transfers energy into rotational KE.
This is the way that the ramp 'helps' the ball go higher.
 
  • #11
Frictionless surface.
 
  • #12
SammyS said:
Frictionless surface.
Yes, I understand that. I was just using rolling down a frictional slope as an example of how a force that does no work can transfer energy from one mode to another. The same happens here, but not in respect of rotation.
 
Back
Top