Which is harder to pull apart, a circle or a triangle?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between a circular or triangular ring for securing an anchor, the discussion highlights that the triangular shape may offer better strength due to its ability to distribute forces more effectively. The tension forces at the connection points play a critical role in determining the stability and strength of the shape. An equilateral triangle configuration, with forces at 120° angles, is suggested for optimal performance. Additionally, considerations such as the radius of the inside corners of the ring in relation to the shackle pin are important for overall effectiveness. Ultimately, the triangular shape is likely the stronger option for this application.
AmateurHour
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In deciding which shape of ring I should use to secure an anchor to an anchor trolley I came across two choices, a circular ring or a triangular ring. While either will surely work, I began to wonder which would be more difficult to pull apart. Most of the information I found is about forces being exerted on the shapes from the outside going in like in the case of a load bearing structure. What I am wondering about is the opposite, how much force it would take to pull each shape apart.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The shape of one link from a chain would be better.
 
anorlunda said:
The shape of one link from a chain would be better.
The ring will be attached at three points so that is why I was wondering which shape would be stronger, a circle or a triangle.
 
There is more to be considered than just strength in selecting between the two shapes. Please provide more information about your application and the angles between the three connection points.
 
The solution will probably be a triangle.

The tension forces in the three lines will determine the shape and the position of the ring or node. You must draw up the triangle of forces. If the three forces are equal, then the triangle will be equilateral and the three force vectors will be at 120° to each other.

How will the tension lines be attached to the ring?
Will the inside corners of the ring have the same radius as the pin in the shackle used to connect the line?
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top