- #141
- 27,543
- 19,052
No, that's not the point. The point is that - in the absence of perfect analysis - the current chess algorithms are the best we have. And they lead to the provisional assessment that white has an advantage but not enough to win. THis may change with better algorithms. But, in the absence of more a successful algorithm that shows white with a winning advantage at the start of play, that assessment is unjustifiable.DaveC426913 said:Can we assume they're playing "perfect" games?
If anyone claims that white has enough advantage to win a perfect game, that is a personal view which has no concrete evidence to back it up.