- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Steve Awodey's book: Category Theory (Second Edition) and am focused on Section 1.5 Isomorphisms ...
I need some further help in order to fully understand some further aspects of Definition 1.3, Page 12, including some remarks Awodey makes after the text of the definition ... ...
The start of Section 1.5, including Definition 1.3 ... reads as follows:View attachment 8354In the text of Definition 1.3 we read the following:
" ... ... Since inverses are unique (proof!), we write \(\displaystyle g = f^{-1}\). ... ... "Can someone please demonstrate a rigorous proof that in a category, inverses are unique ... ?Help will be appreciated ...
Peter
I need some further help in order to fully understand some further aspects of Definition 1.3, Page 12, including some remarks Awodey makes after the text of the definition ... ...
The start of Section 1.5, including Definition 1.3 ... reads as follows:View attachment 8354In the text of Definition 1.3 we read the following:
" ... ... Since inverses are unique (proof!), we write \(\displaystyle g = f^{-1}\). ... ... "Can someone please demonstrate a rigorous proof that in a category, inverses are unique ... ?Help will be appreciated ...
Peter