Why Are Reflected Rays Often Ignored in Lens Studies?

In summary, reflected rays are often ignored in lens studies because the primary focus is on the direct transmission of light through lenses, which significantly influences image formation. Reflections typically contribute less to the overall optical behavior and can complicate analysis. Additionally, standard lens equations and models primarily address refraction, making reflected rays less relevant in most practical applications. However, in certain scenarios, such as analyzing multi-coated lenses or specific optical systems, reflected rays can have a notable impact and should not be overlooked.
  • #1
E3Phy
2
1
Hi,
I am wondering why reflected rays are not considered with lenses? If a Ray strikes a surface another is reflected off that striking point; however, this is not added when studying lenses, only refracted rays are considered.
Is there any law which gives the ratio of reflected and refracted rays with lenses?

Cheers.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
The reflection is very dim, so isn't really useful and you usually ignore them. If you get into optical engineering you can certainly consider reflections. You generally want to make sure they're absorbed somewhere in the system because they typically annoy the user by giving ghost images - google "lens flare" for the most common example of these.
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and DaveE
  • #3
E3Phy said:
I am wondering why reflected rays are not considered with lenses?
Maybe because they aren't always pertinent to the person doing the analysis. If there's a reason to consider them, they can be analyzed.

E3Phy said:
Is there any law which gives the ratio of reflected and refracted rays
Yes. Absolutely. Although it can be quite a chore. Normally you would minimize reflection in a conventional lens, or maximize it for mirror lenses (like most modern telescopes). The other rays are, hopefully, insignificant and don't require detailed analysis. However, there are optical systems where it does matter.

This is all based on the basic classical E&M concept of reflection and transmission coefficients.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and Ibix
  • #4
Thank you all for your answers; just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything; I'll study the given links further
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #5
E3Phy said:
why reflected rays are not considered with lenses?
A good optical design would considered a parasite reflections and a scattered light. Most optical soft are intended for optimizing the main light flow passing the optical system, but there are special modes to study secondary reflections and scattering. However it is more difficult level as demanding to have a good models of the coatings and baffles. Good design should at least consider that the parasite reflection should not focus close to the image plane to avoid host images.
The most difficult is the management of the scattered light which demands exact model of lenses, mechanics, baffles, coatings on optical and mechanical surfaces in combination with a different combination of the objects in the object space.
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and DaveE
  • #6
E3Phy said:
Thank you all for your answers; just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything; I'll study the given links further
Those reflections are always there and they're the bane of the designer's life. The reflections are from the surfaces (and there may be six in a three element , high quality lens. The surfaces of the lens elements are not just spherical and the secondary images occur all over the place.
 

Attachments

  • 1708444906258.png
    1708444906258.png
    29.3 KB · Views: 35

FAQ: Why Are Reflected Rays Often Ignored in Lens Studies?

Why are reflected rays often ignored in lens studies?

Reflected rays are often ignored in lens studies because the primary focus is on the refracted rays that pass through the lens, which are responsible for image formation. Reflected rays typically contribute minimally to the overall optical behavior of the system, and including them can complicate the analysis without adding significant value to the understanding of the lens's function.

How does ignoring reflected rays simplify lens analysis?

Ignoring reflected rays simplifies lens analysis by reducing the number of variables and interactions that need to be considered. This allows for a more straightforward application of geometric optics principles, such as the lens maker's equation, and helps in focusing on the primary paths that light takes to form images.

Are there any situations where reflected rays cannot be ignored in lens studies?

Yes, there are situations where reflected rays cannot be ignored, such as in high-precision optical systems, interferometry, or when dealing with lenses with highly reflective coatings. In these cases, reflected rays can introduce significant errors or artifacts that must be accounted for to achieve accurate results.

What impact do reflected rays have on optical aberrations?

Reflected rays can contribute to optical aberrations such as ghosting, flare, and other unwanted artifacts that degrade image quality. However, in many standard lens applications, these effects are minor compared to the primary aberrations caused by refracted rays, and thus are often neglected for simplicity.

How do anti-reflective coatings affect the consideration of reflected rays in lens studies?

Anti-reflective coatings are designed to minimize the intensity of reflected rays, thereby reducing their impact on the optical system. By decreasing the reflectance at the lens surfaces, these coatings help in simplifying lens studies further by making the reflected rays even less significant, allowing for a more accurate focus on the refracted rays.

Similar threads

Back
Top