Why Are Repeating Decimals Less Than Denominator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uranium_235
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Repeating decimals are always less than their denominator because the long division process generates a finite number of possible remainders. When dividing an integer by another integer, the remainders can only range from 0 to one less than the denominator, leading to a maximum of N-1 unique remainders. Once a remainder repeats, the division process starts to repeat, resulting in a repeating decimal. This concept can be illustrated through various examples of long division. Understanding this principle is crucial for grasping why the number of repeating digits is consistently less than the denominator.
uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If the repeating decimal is equal to a/b, why is the number of repeating digits less than the denominator b?
This was a question on my homework, and I could not find mathematical proof for the conclusion that number repeating digits is always less than b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key lies in doing long division (at least that's how I discovered it way back when); run through a few dozen examples, maybe you'll pick up on it.
 
I don’t wish to seem a bit impatient, but is it possible one could post the mathematical proof? We will most likely be going over this in class tomorrow, and I do not wish to be behind in the event I am not able to find the answer before then.
 
Okay - imagine performing long division of an integer by an integer. In each step you have a remainder. There are only N possible remainders (from 0 up to N-1). If one of them is 0 then you're done. Otherwise, of the other possible remainders (from 1 up to N-1) you can only go through N-1 steps before one of those very same remainders occurs once again - it's inevitable! At that point, each step repeats the previous ones and therefore your quotient must repeat over and over!
 
Thank you for your help, Tide and Hurkyl.
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top