MHB Why can't I apply L'Hopital's rule to all indeterminate forms?

AI Thread Summary
L'Hôpital's rule cannot be applied to all indeterminate forms, as demonstrated in the example of the limit as x approaches 3 for the expression (x^4 - 81)/(2x^2 - 5x - 3). In this case, applying the rule incorrectly led to an answer of 9, while the correct limit is 108/7. The discussion highlights that both the numerator and denominator can be factored to simplify the evaluation without needing L'Hôpital's rule. Recognizing the common factor of (x - 3) in both polynomials allows for easier computation. Ultimately, proper simplification is crucial for accurately resolving limits in indeterminate forms.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I have a certain set of problems (i.e. https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/limcondirectory/LimitConstant.html), where many problems are in an indeterminate form ($\frac{0}{0}$) but if we apply L'Hopital's rule it yields an incorrect answer. Instead, I have to simplify the expression and then evaluate the expression like normal.

For example, $$\lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}$$.

If I apply l'hopital's rule, I get $\frac{x^3}{x} = 9$ but this is the wrong answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
I have a certain set of problems (i.e. https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/limcondirectory/LimitConstant.html), where many problems are in an indeterminate form ($\frac{0}{0}$) but if we apply L'Hopital's rule it yields an incorrect answer. Instead, I have to simplify the expression and then evaluate the expression like normal.

For example, $$\lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}$$.

If I apply l'hopital's rule, I get $\frac{x^3}{x} = 9$ but this is the wrong answer.

Hi tmt! ;)

Applying L'Hôpital's rule I'm getting:
$$\lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}
= \lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{4x^3}{4x - 5}
= \frac{4\cdot 3^3}{4\cdot 3 - 5}
= \frac{108}{7}
$$
 
Applying L'Hopital's rule, that is, differentiating numerator and denominator separately, we have [math]\frac{4x^3}{4x- 5}[/math], not "[math]\frac{x^3}{x}[/math]. It looks like you forgot the "-5" in the derivative of the denominator.

Added later: for a problem like this, you don't really need to apply "L'Hopital's rule". Since numerator and denominator are polynomials that are equal to 0 when x= 3, it follows immediately that both have a factor of x- 3. x^4- 81= (x^2- 9)(x^2+ 9)= (x- 3)(x+ 3)(x^3+ 9). 2x^2- 5x- 3= (2x+ 1)(x- 3). (Knowing that x- 3 is a factor makes that a lot easier to factor.)

So, for x not equal to 3, \frac{x^2- 81}{x^2- 5x- 3}=\frac{(x- 3)(x+ 3)(x^2+ 9)}{(x- 3)(2x+ 1)}= \frac{(x+ 3)(x^2+ 9)}{2x+ 1} and so \lim_{x\to 3}\frac{x^2- 81}{x^2- 5x- 3}= \lim_{x\to 3} \frac{(x+ 3)(x^2+ 9)}{2x+ 1}= \frac{(3+ 3)(9+ 9)}{ 6+ 1}= \frac{108}{7}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top