Why Can't Information Travel Faster Than Light Without Breaking Causality?

alpha_wolf
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
"Information cannot travel faster than c"
"If information could travel faster than c, we would loose causality"
Just wandering - who came up with these and why? In other words:
1. Why can't information travel at some higher finite speed?
2. Why would we loose causality in that case?

Note that I'm posting here in the relativity forum, since I suspect this has much to do with relativity... Was this Einstein's idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's based on Special Relativity -- information traveling faster than c breaks cause an effect.

The basic geometric cause of the paradox is this: If, in one reference frame, information travels from point A to point B, then there are other reference frames in which the same piece of information travels from point B to point A.

That is, when information is transmitted faster than c, it is impossible to tell the difference between the source and the destination!

With a little care, you can arrange fun paradoxes, such as FTL transmission of information that's "supposed" to from A to B then back to A, but it arrives back at A before it was ever sent! Thus it is said to violate causality -- it violates the "law" cause and effect.
 
alpha_wolf said:
"Information cannot travel faster than c"
"If information could travel faster than c, we would loose causality"
Just wandering - who came up with these and why? In other words:
1. Why can't information travel at some higher finite speed?
2. Why would we loose causality in that case?

Note that I'm posting here in the relativity forum, since I suspect this has much to do with relativity... Was this Einstein's idea?

This may or may not answer your question, but this paper is barely 2 weeks old...

http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1

Zz.
 
information cannot travel faster then c because we would loose causality...This is a consequence of the special theory of relativity where c is postulated to be constant for all observers. This was an idea from Einstein.

Loosing causlity is not allowed because this is not physical. It means that the consequence of some action can occur before the actual action... Something like you die before you are born...this is crazy talk, wouldn't you say?

marlon
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top