Why cant rads be converted to cpm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuclear-boy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Rads measure both the number of emitted particles and their energy, while counts per minute (CPM) only measure the number of particles emitted. The relationship between rads and CPM is not fixed and depends on the energy of the emitted particles from the radioactive source. Different radiation types deposit varying amounts of energy, affecting the conversion between these units. A unified understanding of radiation measurements has evolved over time, but the complexity of radiation's effects on matter has led to multiple units still being in use today.
nuclear-boy
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
hi,


i have a geiger counter which measures radiation in rads, but not many people use rads anymore (it is almost obselete i think),


am i correct it saying that rads are a measure of the number of particles being emitted AND the energy of the particle, but cpm is merely a measure of the number of particles being emitted?

if i had a radioactive source, (e.g. a lump of uranium ore), and i measure the radiation using a geiger counter that measures in rads and the measurement = 1 rad,
and i measure the same radioactive source with a geiger counter which measures in cpm, and the measurement = 1000 CPM, does that mean that 1 rad will always equal 1000 CPM? or does that only apply to a radioactive source which emits particles of the same energy as the aforemetioned radioactive source?

it would be really helpful if someone would measure the radioactivity of common radioactive items (e.g. am. 241 smoke alarm source,fiesta ware plate,lantern mantle) using a geiger counter that measures in rads, and a geiger counter which measures in cpm, and provide a rough conversion chart.



lolol i tried to make this as non-confusing as possible but i think i failed miserably haha

thanks for reading my long spiel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One reason there are all these units in radiation physics is because of the multiple effects radiation has on matter. There's the number of emitted particles, the energy those particles deposit into matter, and the amount of ionization caused by the passage of those particles. Furthermore, different particles deposit different amounts of energy, and in biology, different tissues are more or less sensitive to the effects of radiation.

Today, we have a reasonably unified view of all these effects. But around 1900, no such understanding existed: hence, all the different units.

This site might help you:
http://online.unitconverterpro.com/unit-conversion/radiation.html

This may help answer some questions also:
http://www.radprocalculator.com/FAQ.aspx
 
nuclear-boy said:
hi,


i have a geiger counter which measures radiation in rads, but not many people use rads anymore (it is almost obselete i think),


am i correct it saying that rads are a measure of the number of particles being emitted AND the energy of the particle, but cpm is merely a measure of the number of particles being emitted?


You are almost correct. Here is a breakdown of the different units:

CPM/DPM/Becquerels/Curies: measures number of radiations, regardless of type. CPM is slightly different in that it is dependent on the efficiency of the radiation detector, while the latter three are quantities of the actual radiation source.

Rad: A measure of absorbed radiation energy (Joules per Kg)

Roentgen (R): A measure of a combination of radiation intensity and energy (Coulombs per Kg)

REM (Roentgen equivalent man): same as R, but with a weighting factor depending on the radiation type (alpha/beta/gamma/neutron). This is the most common unit used in the US.
 
Andy Resnick said:
One reason there are all these units in radiation physics is because of the multiple effects radiation has on matter. There's the number of emitted particles, the energy those particles deposit into matter, and the amount of ionization caused by the passage of those particles. Furthermore, different particles deposit different amounts of energy, and in biology, different tissues are more or less sensitive to the effects of radiation.

Today, we have a reasonably unified view of all these effects. But around 1900, no such understanding existed: hence, all the different units.

This site might help you:
http://online.unitconverterpro.com/unit-conversion/radiation.html

This may help answer some questions also:
http://www.radprocalculator.com/FAQ.aspx



thanks ill have a look at those websites soon, thanks for your help xx :)
could you maybe reply to this thread too please?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=411875


thanks again
 
Last edited by a moderator:
QuantumPion said:
You are almost correct. Here is a breakdown of the different units:

CPM/DPM/Becquerels/Curies: measures number of radiations, regardless of type. CPM is slightly different in that it is dependent on the efficiency of the radiation detector, while the latter three are quantities of the actual radiation source.

Rad: A measure of absorbed radiation energy (Joules per Kg)

Roentgen (R): A measure of a combination of radiation intensity and energy (Coulombs per Kg)

REM (Roentgen equivalent man): same as R, but with a weighting factor depending on the radiation type (alpha/beta/gamma/neutron). This is the most common unit used in the US.





thanks for your help i greatly appreciate it, can rems be converted to rads, or vice-versa?
could you maybe reply to this thread please?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=411875
 
thanks for all of your help, i greatly appreciate it :)
 
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...

Similar threads

Back
Top