Why Do Different Methods of Loading Affect Spring Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter confusseed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Springs
AI Thread Summary
Different methods of loading a spring affect spring calculations due to the forces involved. When a mass is dropped onto a hanging spring, the gravitational force (mg) equates to the spring force (-kx) at rest, leading to the equation x = -mg/k for displacement. This explains why the potential energy equation PE = 1/2kx^2 is derived from the negative integral of the spring force. When gently lowering the mass, the spring does not experience the same dynamic forces, resulting in different calculations. Understanding these principles clarifies the discrepancies in outcomes based on loading methods.
confusseed
5
0
can someone explain to me how springs work?
I already know the equation of elastic pe= 1/2kx^2 but I need more explanation!
how come when a mass is dropped from a hanging spring I can multiply the mass by 9.8m/s^2 to get the force, then divide the answer by the spring's constant (20n/cm) then divide by two and get the right answer every time but when it is gently let down, I get the right answer without dividing by two and how come these methods do not work when the spring is on the ground and the mass is being dropped from a height?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your making me confused! I think you should try expressing yourslef more clearly, and people will be better equipted to help you!

Ok, for the P.E. I do not know how in-depth you go into this stuff. PE = -INT(F), that is, the potential energy is ALWAYS the negative integral of the force. Since the force for a spring is -kx, it is apparent where the PE equation comes from. We expect it to be positive all the time, because for all displacements (stretching of the spring) it must have a positive potential, as it stands to gain kinetic energy. Also note for x=o the potential is zeo, as we expect.

I think you want to find the displacement of a mass hanging on a spring. Well, first note that there are two forces acting on the mass. Gravitational force acting down, and th spring acting upwards. Therefore:
-kx = mg

mg is the force due to gravity, and -kx the force due to the spring. We equate them because when the block comes to rest, the forces must be equal.

Solving for x:
x = -mg/k

The negative sign just tells us it is displaced downwards.
I don't know what else you want.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top