Why Do Photons Follow a Sine Wave Pattern Instead of Other Paths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter taylaron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
taylaron
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
1
To my understanding, photons are the medium in which electromagnetic radiation is transmitted. These photons follow a sine wave with different wavelengths etc... according to its position on the EM spectrum at the speed of light.
note* -with every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

so my question: why does a photon follow a sine wave opposed to having a linear path or following any other defined path e.g. a spiral pattern?

When you separate the 2 components of a sine wave, you have the z axis (direction the wave propagates at) and in this case the x axis. the photon follows the z axis at a constant velocity (speed of light). of course. but the x-axis is where I am confused. the pattern is up, down, up down etc... But what is keeping the photon from just going 'up' or just 'down'?.
why doesn't it move in all 3 axis (in this simulation) where the x and y-axis are oscillating, forming a spiral pattern? Of course there are endless patterns that could be applied. in that case, who says it has to be repetitious?

Thanks-

Tay
 
Physics news on Phys.org
taylaron said:
To my understanding, photons are the medium in which electromagnetic radiation is transmitted. These photons follow a sine wave with different wavelengths etc... according to its position on the EM spectrum at the speed of light.
note* -with every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

so my question: why does a photon follow a sine wave opposed to having a linear path or following any other defined path e.g. a spiral pattern?

When you separate the 2 components of a sine wave, you have the z axis (direction the wave propagates at) and in this case the x axis. the photon follows the z axis at a constant velocity (speed of light). of course. but the x-axis is where I am confused. the pattern is up, down, up down etc... But what is keeping the photon from just going 'up' or just 'down'?.
why doesn't it move in all 3 axis (in this simulation) where the x and y-axis are oscillating, forming a spiral pattern? Of course there are endless patterns that could be applied. in that case, who says it has to be repetitious?

Thanks-

Tay

Not sure if I exactly understand your question. Who says it has to be a certain way? No one knows WHY the laws of physics are as they are.

But regarding the photon: they have a characteristic frequency just like a vibrating string. However, thinking of a photon as a vibrating string (or otherwise as something that literally moves back and forth) is taking an analogy too far. Photons are thought to take "many paths" in some views, and they may be neither straight nor in a sine pattern. Those paths interfere constructively and destructively in most situations, somewhat like waves on an ocean. However, you should be very careful not to imagine a photon under any single analogy as one works in some cases, another in other cases, and no analogy works in yet others. Despite our ability to accurately predict photon behavior in experiments, in a lot of ways our knowledge is still not very concise about their underlying nature.
 
Thanks Mr. C, I think I see your point.
thanks for your input.

-Tay
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top