- #36
Rika
- 233
- 51
FroChro said:I doesn't like present culture of academia either, and I am not saying what you write is nonsense. I just think you are too much practical, too much "common sense". And I believe I have seen some well-meaning people to act in the name of practicality and common sense and cause quite tragic consequences.
What do you mean by that?
chill_factor said:I have no idea why people want to do theoretical physics.
I wanted to do pen and paper theoretical physics because I have anti-talent for programming and I am too clumsy to do an experiment :P
I had an idea that this kind of job is about "creating new stuff on paper" but it's not like that :P
Now I have a job where I do "creating new stuff on a paper" but implementation is most important process.
chill_factor said:UCLA for instance admits only 20% of physics graduate applicants, who are already self selecting. They admit almost 60% of mechanical engineers and almost 50% of chemists for their graduate degrees. PHD chemists and mechanical engineers almost *CERTAINLY* will have a much higher chance of working in their respective fields and making good money than physicists.
Engineering is cool in one way - even if you do pen and paper work - I mean a design, you have a chance to confront your ideas with reality while in theoretical physics it's not always possible.
Most of my physics peers ended up in various engineering fields, programming, teaching or medical physics.
Another strange thing about Americans - even through they make a war all round the world most american physicists think that working on weapons is immoral while I think that's one of most interesting and exciting job that physicists can have.
Last edited: