Why Do Spring Constants Vary With Different Calculation Methods?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the spring constant using different methods, leading to varying results. When using force calculations, the spring constant k is determined to be 98 N/m, while energy calculations yield 196 N/m. The discrepancy arises because the energy method does not account for the system's dynamics, such as kinetic energy, when the mass is released. The correct approach emphasizes that the mass is at rest against the spring, allowing for a straightforward force balance. For part B, the user seeks clarification on when to consider the mass's final state to find its velocity after being released from the spring.
mike115
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Spring - Forces or Energy?

Homework Statement


A spring of length 0.80 m rests along a frictionless 30 degree incline. A 2.0 kg mass, at rest against the end of the spring, compresses the spring by 0.10 m.
A) Determine the spring constant k .
B) The mass is pushed down, compressing the spring an additional 0.60 m, and then released. If the incline is 2.0m long, determine how far beyond the rightmost edge of the incline the mass lands.


Homework Equations


Fspr = k*x
Wspr = .5*k*x^2


The Attempt at a Solution


For part A, I get two different answers for the spring constant depending on whether I try to use forces or energy. Can somebody explain why one way is correct? Why doesn't forces/energy give the correct answer?

Fspr = Fg parallel to the incline
k*x = m*g*sin(30)
k*.1 = 2*9.8*sin(30)
k = 98 N/m

Wspr = PEg
.5*k*x^2 = m*g*x*sin(30)
.5*k*.1^2 = 2*9.8*.1*sin(30)
k = 196 N/m

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can't blindly use those equations for potential energy. you have to think about what you are doing. there would be a kinetic contribution if the box were just to drop down on the spring.

as it is you can suppose that someone slowly let the box set down and compress the spring. the spring did work on the box etc etc, but who cares.

use the fact that the box is already just sitting there (regardless of how the box got there) at rest (not accelerating either) so that the forces must be equal.
 


can you explain how to do part B

im not exactly sure how to set it up
heres what i have:

(mass = 2.4 kg and k = 117.72 N/m)

(PEg + PEs)i = (PEg + KE)f
mgh + .5kx^2 = mgh + .5mv^2

2.4 kg (9.81 m/s^2) (0.1 m) sin 30 + .5(117.72 N/m)(0.60 m)^2 = 2.4 kg (9.81m/s^2)(0.70 m) sin 30 + .5(2.4 kg) v^2

what I am most confused about is where I should consider "final" to find velocity
so for example is it when the spring is completely relaxed or is it when the mass is resting on it (compressing it .1 m)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top