Why Do Star Trails Appear Denser on One Side of the National Geographic Photo?

AI Thread Summary
The National Geographic star trail photo shows denser trails on the right side due to a higher concentration of bright stars in that section of the sky. Overexposure of the trails contributes to the perceived density. It is suggested that the photographer may have stacked multiple images, which could lead to misalignment and a less sharp appearance compared to single exposure shots. The imbalance in star trail density is a common observation in astrophotography. Overall, the photo highlights the complexities of capturing star trails effectively.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That section of the sky simply has more bright stars than the other.
 
I'm sure Drakkith is correct--also the actual trails seem a bit overexposed, and that exacerbates the effect. I would guess that the photographer possibly 'stacked' multiple images and the alignment might have been off a bit, because the single exposure shots I've seen tend to be sharper. Anyway, see the shot on the homepage here--
http://startrails.de/
It resembles the one you referenced, as far as the imbalance you noted...
 

Thread 'How feasible is home radio astronomy?'

Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Visible light Over Large Distances'

How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
View full post »

Similar threads

Big Bang Big Schmang, astronomical redshift is an artifact of distance
Replies
1
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 262)
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top