Why Do String Theory and Fermions Require Different Treatments?

moriheru
Messages
273
Reaction score
17
This is a stupid question (good that I ask). String theory treats bosons and fermions in different ways e.g fermion potential are differ from boson potentials,actions differ and so on...
My question is simply : why?
Yes I know fermions and bosons are different groups of particles (integer and non-integer spin) and have many differences, but how are these incoperated in the action or potential.
Specifically why does one need anticomuting dynamical variables for fermions?
Thanks for any clarifications.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using anticommuting objects to represent fermions is a characteristic of quantum field theory rather than string theory. As you say, bosons and fermions have certain different properties and the important one here is the observation that no two identical fermions are ever seen in the same quantum state. For example, in the ground state of helium, the electrons always have opposite spin, If we found a helium atom with both electrons with the same spin, it would always be in an excited state, where the electrons were in different orbitals.

In quantum mechanics, we account for this by using an antisymmetric wavefunction for the state describing two identical fermions. Say we are in some position basis and we label the fermions as 1,2, then we can write:

$$\Psi(x_1,x_2;1,2) = \psi(x_1;1)\psi(x_2;2) - \psi(x_2;1)\psi(x_1;2).$$

If we consider an operation where we now place fermion 2 at the point ##x_1## and fermion 1 at the point ##x_2##, our new wavefunction is

$$\Psi(x_2,x_1;1,2) = - \Psi(x_1,x_2;1,2).$$

This is also called the exchange symmetry for fermions. In this case, we find that it is impossible to find the two fermions at the same point in space: ##\Psi(x,x;1,2)=0## because of the antisymmetry of the wavefunction.

In quantum field theory, quantum states are replaced by quantum fields ##\hat{\psi}##. These are operators that act on the vacuum state to produce one particle states:

$$\hat{\psi}_1(x_1) |0\rangle = |x_1,1\rangle.$$

If we demand that the quantum fields describing fermions anticommute, ##\hat{\psi}_1(x_1)\hat{\psi}_2(x_2)=-\hat{\psi}_2(x_2)\hat{\psi}_1(x_1)##, then we guarantee that the multiparticle states that the fields create will satisfy the correct exchange symmetry for fermions. We no longer have to force it by hand since it is a fundamental property of the theory.

When you see anticommuting variables being used for fermions in the description of the string worldsheet, that is because the tools of two-dimensional quantum field theory are used. The treatment of fermions at that level is not something unique to string theory.
 
  • Like
Likes moriheru
this thread is to open up discussion on Gravi-GUT as theories of everything GUT or Grand Unified Theories attempt to unify the 3 forces of weak E&M and strong force, and Gravi-GUT want to add gravity. this peer reviewed paper in a journal on Gravi-GUT Chirality in unified theories of gravity F. Nesti1 and R. Percacci2 Phys. Rev. D 81, 025010 – Published 14 January, 2010 published by Physical Review D this paper is cited by another more recent Gravi-GUT these papers and research...
In post #549 here I answered: And then I was surprised by the comment of Tom, asking how the pairing was done. Well, I thought that I had discussed it in some thread in BSM, but after looking at it, it seems that I did only a few sparse remarks here and there. On other hand, people was not liking to interrupt the flow of the thread and I have been either contacted privately or suggested to open a new thread. So here it is. The development can be traced in some draft papers...
Back
Top