Why Do Torques Use a Negative Sign in Inverted Pendulum Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arslan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of negative signs in torque equations for an inverted pendulum. The confusion arises from the definition of the angle theta, which increases in the clockwise direction, leading to clockwise torques being considered positive. Participants clarify that the sign convention is critical, as it dictates how torques are summed in the equations. The direction of rotation and the application of forces on the cart are acknowledged but deemed irrelevant to the sign convention issue. Ultimately, understanding the chosen sign convention is essential for correctly interpreting the equations.
Arslan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
i have problem with the equation encircled in red in the figure. I(theeta)''=sum of all torqes acting on the body. but they are taking torques in the negative direction why.
It should be -VLsin+HLcos=I(theeta)''
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Arslan said:
i have problem with the equation encircled in red in the figure. I(theeta)''=sum of all torqes acting on the body. but they are taking torques in the negative direction why.
It should be -VLsin+HLcos=I(theeta)''
Because the way theta is defined (with respect to the vertical) it increases in the 'negative' (clockwise) direction. If they defined theta with respect to the horizontal then you'd be correct.
 
but the body is rotating along its center of gravity. If the force is applied on cart, the cart will move in the forward direction and transfer the force to the rod in the direction of red arrow, and the body will rotate along its center of gravity. So body is rotating in counter clockwise direction.
 
Arslan said:
but the body is rotating along its center of gravity. If the force is applied on cart, the cart will move in the forward direction and transfer the force to the rod in the direction of red arrow, and the body will rotate along its center of gravity. So body is rotating in counter clockwise direction.
All true, but irrelevant. It's just a matter of sign convention. Since theta is defined in the clockwise direction, torques in the clockwise direction will be positive.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top