Why do we use avg shear stress and not max shear stress?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of average shear stress over maximum shear stress when calculating the safety factor for structural members like pins and bolts. Average shear stress (V/A) is typically applied in direct shear scenarios, while maximum shear stress (VQ/It) is reserved for beams under shear and bending. Variations in shear stress across different dimensions complicate the reliance on maximum shear stress, making average stress a more practical choice in many cases. Additionally, considerations for contact stresses and bearing stresses at connection points are crucial for accurate assessments. The conversation highlights the importance of thorough calculations and understanding of advanced theories related to ductile fractures.
chad mcelroy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I've been messing around with FEA and I'm trying to match my simulation with hand calculations. While doing this it occurred to me that i really don't understand why we use avg shear stress instead of maximum shear stress when determining the safety factor of a structural member i.e. a pin
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
chad mcelroy said:
Hello everyone, I've been messing around with FEA and I'm trying to match my simulation with hand calculations. While doing this it occurred to me that i really don't understand why we use avg shear stress instead of maximum shear stress when determining the safety factor of a structural member i.e. a pin
When a bolt or pin is in direct shear, average V/A shear stress is used. Maximum VQ/It shear stresses are used for beams subject to shear and bending. But often in a Wide Flange beam average shear stress is used by using the area of the web and not the flanges, and you get close to the same result as the max shear stress formula. Even the max shear stress hand calculation is an approximation, because there are variations in shear stress not only top to bottom, but often left to right as well,as FEA might show. The safety factor has it covered. Nothing tops the good old fashioned hand calcs.
 
PhanthomJay thank you for replying. I did a double shear test on 3/8 in rod of C1215 steel. I've attached the image I think. On the top and bottom of the rod the surface has noticeably yielded as if it has been cut into. are contact stresses a factor as well as avg shear stress. I'm trying to accurately account for all stresses in this type of application. Also do you know of any literature or online resources that I could use to learn more advanced theories of ductile fractures.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-11_9-37-2.png
    upload_2018-4-11_9-37-2.png
    110.8 KB · Views: 554
chad mcelroy said:
PhanthomJay thank you for replying. I did a double shear test on 3/8 in rod of C1215 steel. I've attached the image I think. On the top and bottom of the rod the surface has noticeably yielded as if it has been cut into. are contact stresses a factor as well as avg shear stress. I'm trying to accurately account for all stresses in this type of application. Also do you know of any literature or online resources that I could use to learn more advanced theories of ductile fractures.

Thank you
besides checking for shear stresses in bolts or rods (using average V/A shear stress calculations when bolt or rod is subject to shear and not bending), you must also check for bearing stresses in the bolt and plate at the contact area between the bolt/rod and the connected plate hole wall. Most codes allow for some deformation and yielding at the bearing contact areas. I haven't done much research in ductile fracture theories. Shear tear out in the plate must also be checked for holes near edges.
 
  • Like
Likes chad mcelroy
Thank you for your help
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top