- #1
Jarvis323
- 1,243
- 987
I've always struggled with the use of the word interpretation in the context of QM. Most so called interpretations do not seem like interpretations at all. Despite what might seem obvious, the conflation between the normal use of the word interpretation and the use of the word interpretation in QM seems to cause a great deal of confusion and ambiguity in the discussions.
Is this perception way off the mark? Why do people in the field of QM use this word, and what does it actually mean? Is it because of the historical conversations and careful/political wording to avoid appearing to challenge QM, a sort of loophole?
What word should we use to describe the so called QM interpretations?
Is this perception way off the mark? Why do people in the field of QM use this word, and what does it actually mean? Is it because of the historical conversations and careful/political wording to avoid appearing to challenge QM, a sort of loophole?
What word should we use to describe the so called QM interpretations?