Why Does 802.11a Struggle with Penetration Compared to 802.11g?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jastewart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the differences in signal penetration and range between 802.11a and 802.11g due to their operating frequencies. The 802.11g standard operates at 2.4GHz, which allows for better penetration through obstacles and less signal attenuation compared to the 5GHz frequency used by 802.11a. As frequency increases, the ability of the signal to penetrate objects decreases, which is a key factor in the performance differences between these two Wi-Fi standards. An analogy is drawn to visible light, which, despite being a form of electromagnetic radiation like Wi-Fi, cannot penetrate even thin paper due to its high frequency. Overall, the 2.4GHz band of 802.11g provides greater range and better penetration than the 5GHz band of 802.11a.
jastewart
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am looking into why 802.11a does not permeate as well as 802.11g. I know that they are different freq. Does this mean a different cell size per packet as well?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Almost all of the extra range comes from the different frequencies, the 2.4GHz band that 802.11g operates in attenuates significantly less than the 5GHz band that 802.11a operates in. As frequency increases (wavelength decreases) the ability to penetrate objects goes down (generally, some exceptions).

As an extreme example, visible light is the same stuff as wifi signals (EM radiation), yet is unable to penetrate even thin paper due to its extremely high frequency.
 
RFMatt said:
Almost all of the extra range comes from the different frequencies, the 2.4GHz band that 802.11g operates in attenuates significantly less than the 5GHz band that 802.11a operates in. As frequency increases (wavelength decreases) the ability to penetrate objects goes down (generally, some exceptions).

As an extreme example, visible light is the same stuff as wifi signals (EM radiation), yet is unable to penetrate even thin paper due to its extremely high frequency.
Thank you! Excellent!
 
Well, the date has now passed, and Windows 10 is no longer supported. Hopefully, the readers of this forum have done one of the many ways this issue can be handled. If not, do a YouTube search and a smorgasbord of solutions will be returned. What I want to mention is that I chose to use a debloated Windows from a debloater. There are many available options, e.g., Chris Titus Utilities (I used a product called Velotic, which also features AI to prevent your computer from overheating etc...
I've been having problems for the past few weeks with the display on my Dell computer. I bought the computer new back in 2019 or so, which makes it about 6 years old. My monitor is a 27" HP monitor that I bought for another computer (an HP Pavilion), recently demised, back in about 2012 or 2013. As far as I can tell, the computer, which is running a 10-core Xeon Scalable processor, is functioning as it should. The first symptom was that the screen would go dark, which I would attempt to...
Back
Top