Why Does a Conducting Shell Show Zero Electric Flux Despite an Internal Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JamesL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of electric flux in a conducting hollow spherical shell with an internal point charge. It concludes that the net electric flux through the shell is zero, as the electric field inside the shell is directed towards the inner wall, making the dot product with the surface normal zero. This contradicts the initial assumption that the flux would equal q/epsilon, highlighting the importance of considering the shell's thickness and volume. Regarding the charge distribution on the outer surface, it remains indeterminate without specific details about the point charge's location and magnitude. Overall, the key takeaway is that the electric field's behavior within the conductor leads to a zero net flux and an uncertain external charge distribution.
JamesL
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem:

Consider an uncharged, conducting hollow spherical shell. The electric field on the inside of the surface of the spherical shell is measured to be directed towards the inner shell wall and varies in magnitude over the shell's inside surface. It is known that the only charge in the hollow cavity inside the spherical shell is a point charge with magniuted q.

---------------------------

I've already concluded that the sign of point charge q is positive, and that the charge is not located at the center of the spherical shell.

Now the two next questions kind of stump me.

1) What is the net electric flux through the sherical shell?

a)flux = q/(2*Epsilon)
b)flux = 0
c)flux = (2*q)/epsilon
d)flux = q/epsilon
e)flux = 2*q
f)flux = q/2
g)flux = q

According to my physics textbook, "the net flux through any closed surface surrounding a point charge q is given by q/epsilon and is independent of the shape of that surface."

So naturally my first answer was d (flux = q/epsilon)... but my online homework service counted this incorrect.

What am i missing guys?

------------------------

The next question i am not really sure how to go about solving.

2)What can you say about the charge distribution on the outside surface of the spherical shell?

a)The charge distribution is negative and is not uniform.
b)The charge distribution is 0.
c)The charge distribution is negative and is uniform.
d)The charge distribution is positive and is not uniform.
e)The charge distribution is positive and is uniform.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The question is tricky. The spherical shell is not a "surface" It has thickness and so it has "volume". I think the question may want to ask you what is the flux into/out of this volume?

2) Presumably there will be some negative charges on the inner surface, and so there will be some positive charges on the outer wall. Can the positive charge in the spherical shell and the negative charges on the inner wall exert any *net* force on the positive charges on the outer wall? It may help if you think about whether there can be any electric field inside a conductor (in static case).
 


For the first question, the correct answer is actually b) flux = 0. This is because the electric field inside the shell is directed towards the inner wall, meaning it is perpendicular to the surface of the shell. Therefore, the electric flux through the surface is 0 since the dot product of the electric field and the surface normal is 0.

For the second question, it is not possible to determine the charge distribution on the outside surface of the shell with the given information. This is because the electric field inside the shell is dependent on the distribution of the point charge inside the cavity. Without knowing the exact location and magnitude of the point charge, we cannot determine the charge distribution on the outside surface.
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top