Why Does Early Universe Have Low Entropy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrspeedybob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
AI Thread Summary
Entropy is often associated with randomness, and in everyday life, systems naturally evolve from lower to higher entropy states, a principle supported by thermodynamics. The early universe, however, exhibited low entropy, raising questions about its initial conditions. The "big bang" is described not as a conventional explosion but as an expansion of space itself, meaning every point in the universe was simultaneously a center of this expansion. During the initial phases, the rapid expansion prevented points in space from interacting, limiting the formation of a random distribution of matter and energy. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the complexities of the universe's origins.
mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Entropy has been defined as nearly synonamous with randomness (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...&sa=X&ei=PyWxTPLOFcT6lwf-rZmYDQ&ved=0CBIQkAE"). In our every-day experience things naturaly progress from a state of less entropy to a state of more entropy. This observation has even been elevated to the status of a physical law of thermodynamics. My question is why did the early universe have such low entropy? It seems like everything exploding from a single point would lead to a highly random distribution of mater and energy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Hello. This is my first post in these forums. I have no education in physics and little in mathematics beyond the basics. So, definitely take what I have to say as the opinion of the curious only. Looking forward to some real answers later. :)

One thing to keep in mind is that the "big bang" was not like a typical explosion. In any explosion we are familiar with, it occurs in space, while the "big bang" was an explosion of space. So, there is no central, single point of energy. The central point is every point in the ever expanding space.

Also, it seems to me that during the first phases of this expansion each point had no time with which to communicate with any other point. Even when gravity split and became a distinct force, the very small clumps of matter that were present did not have time to attract or act upon the matter surrounding them.
 
Been around 40 years since I took basic physics in college and while I remember doing some examples of insulation values / energy conduction, I doubt I could to the math now even if I could find the formulas. I have some some corrugated plastic sheet (think of the plastic signs you see on the side of the road) that is used in bee hives. Also have some used in a green house though a bit different in dimensions than this example but the general approach should still apply. Typically, both...
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Back
Top