Why Does My Ideal Gas Formula Derivation Not Include Moles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the ideal gas formula PV = nRT and the heat transfer equation dQ for an infinitesimal quasistatic process. The original poster is confused about the absence of moles (n) in their final equation for dQ, which they derived as dQ = (C_P/R)PdV + (C_V/R)VdP. It is clarified that the suggested answer in their exercise book is incorrect, as it lacks the necessary dimensional consistency with energy. The conversation highlights that dQ should reflect energy per mole, and the derived equation aligns with the ideal gas law under constant pressure conditions. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of dimensional analysis in thermodynamic equations.
PeterPoPS
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show a formula for an ideal gas, but I don't get the right results.

Homework Statement


For an ideal gas PV = nRT where n is the number of momles. Show that the heat transferred in an infinitesimal quasistatic process of an ideal gas can be written as

dQ = \frac{C_V}{nR}VdP + \frac{C_P}{nR}PdV


Homework Equations


<br /> dU = dQ + dW<br />

<br /> C_P = C_V + R<br />

<br /> dU = nC_VdT<br />

<br /> dW = -PdV<br />


The Attempt at a Solution



I differented the formula for the ideal gas PV = nRT so it becomes

PdV + VdP = nRdT

<br /> dT = \frac{PdV + VdP}{nR}<br />

<br /> dU = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R}<br />

<br /> dQ = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R} + PdV = \left(\frac{C_V}{R} + 1\right)PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP = \frac{C_P}{R}PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP<br />

What have I done wrong? There is no dependens on n in my final equation.
I know there should be bars on dW and dQ but i didn't got it to work in latex :/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PeterPoPS said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I differented the formula for the ideal gas PV = nRT so it becomes

PdV + VdP = nRdT

<br /> dT = \frac{PdV + VdP}{nR}<br />

<br /> dU = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R}<br />

<br /> dQ = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R} + PdV = \left(\frac{C_V}{R} + 1\right)PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP = \frac{C_P}{R}PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP<br />

What have I done wrong? There is no dependens on n in my final equation.
I know there should be bars on dW and dQ but i didn't got it to work in latex :/
Your answer is correct. The solution posed by the question is wrong. There is no "n" in the denominator. dQ must have the same dimensions as VdP or PdV, which has dimensions of energy. C_v/R is dimensionless.

AM
 
I have just come across the same problem in an exercise book (no solution unfortunately). Its very unlikely two sources are incorrect?
 
phjw said:
I have just come across the same problem in an exercise book (no solution unfortunately). Its very unlikely two sources are incorrect?
How do you know they are two different sources?

The dimensions of the suggested answer are dimensions of energy per mole. If the dQ was the specific heat flow per mole the suggested answer would be correct, which is maybe what the OP was saying.Consider an expansion at constant pressure. By definition:

(1) dQ = nC_pdT

where C_p is the molar heat capacity at constant pressure.

The solution of the OP gives:

(2) dQ = \frac{C_P}{R}PdV

since VdP = 0 (constant pressure).

You can see that (2) is equivalent to (1) if:

nRdT = PdV

This, of course, follows from the ideal gas law for a constant pressure process.

AM
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top