Why Does the Expectation Value of Momentum Vanish in a Quantum Bound State?

  • Thread starter Thread starter einai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
In quantum mechanics, the expectation value of momentum in a bound state vanishes, which can be shown using the Hamiltonian H = (p^2)/(2m) + V(x). The momentum operator, being a vector, can be expressed in terms of its components, allowing the expansion of the expectation value. In a bound state, the energy eigenvalue E is fixed, enabling simplifications in calculations. The commutation relations among the momentum components indicate that their contributions to the expectation value do not lead to a net momentum. Thus, <E|p|E> = 0 is confirmed for bound states.
einai
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi, I came across a problem which seems to be pretty simple, but I'm stuck :confused: .

Given a Hamiltonian:
H=\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}+V(\vec{x})

If |E> is a bound state of the Hamiltonian with energy eigenvalue E, show that: &lt;E| \vec{p} |E&gt;=0

-----------------------------------
So I've been trying something like this:

\frac{1}{2m}&lt;E|\vec{p} \cdot \vec{p}|E&gt; + &lt;E|V(\vec{x})|E&gt; = E&lt;E|E&gt; = E

but I have no idea how to proceed from here. I don't think I'm on the right track actually.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FYI: This question has been answered in the quantum physics forum.
 


Hi there! It looks like you're on the right track, but there are a few things you can do to simplify your approach. First, remember that the momentum operator \vec{p} is a vector, so it can be written as \vec{p}=\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z. This means that the dot product \vec{p}\cdot\vec{p} can be expanded as:

\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p} = (\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z)\cdot(\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z) = \vec{p}_x^2 + \vec{p}_y^2 + \vec{p}_z^2

Since we're interested in the expectation value of \vec{p}, we can write this as:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = <E|\vec{p}_x^2 + \vec{p}_y^2 + \vec{p}_z^2|E>

Now, remember that in a bound state, the energy eigenvalue E is fixed, so we can pull it out of the expectation value. This gives us:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = E<E|\vec{p}_x^2 + \vec{p}_y^2 + \vec{p}_z^2|E>

Using the definition of the momentum operator, we can write \vec{p}_i^2 = \frac{\vec{p}_i\cdot\vec{p}_i}{2m} for each component i=x,y,z. This gives us:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = E<E|\frac{\vec{p}_x\cdot\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y\cdot\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z\cdot\vec{p}_z}{2m}|E>

Now, using the commutation relation [\vec{p}_i,\vec{p}_j]=0 for all i,j=x,y,z, we can rearrange this expression as:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = E<E|\frac{\vec{p}_x
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top