Why does the horizon area of a black hole never decrease?

M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
Hawking said that the horizon area of a black hole never decreases and illustrated that in his Hawking Are Theorem:

dA/dt ≥ 0

Does anyone know why is it like that. Why doesn't the area decrease?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M. next said:
Hawking said that the horizon area of a black hole never decreases and illustrated that in his Hawking Are Theorem:

dA/dt ≥ 0

Does anyone know why is it like that. Why doesn't the area decrease?


According to the Second Law of BH Thermodynamics, in any classical process, the area of the event horizon does not decrease

dA\geq 0

nor does the black hole's entropy, S_{bh} (the BH's event horizon area can remain stable in classical mechanics but will increase 1) if mass is added or 2) if spin or charge are reduced). The second law of black hole mechanics can, however, be violated if the quantum effect is taken into account, namely that the area of the event horizon can be reduced via Hawking radiation.


BH thermodynamics-

http://www.fysik.su.se/~narit/bh.pdf pages 9-13

http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6024/1/Deeg_Dorothea.pdf pages 11-13
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you a lot for your reply. I now know why does it increase. You are saying if mass is added or if spin or charge is reduced. How was it known? If this is difficult to answer, then I ask why doesn't it decrease? What will happen if you took the other option IF THE AREA DECREASED what will happen? Will this violate something conventional or what do you say?
 
M. next said:
What will happen if you took the other option IF THE AREA DECREASED what will happen? Will this violate something conventional or what do you say?

Hawking proved the area theorem for a classical black hole (i.e., one in which no quantum effects like Hawking radiation are operating) by a geometric argument which requires considerable groundwork to understand. But the gist of it is that the horizon is made up of outgoing light rays that just barely fail to escape to infinity, and the area of the horizon, roughly speaking, counts the "number" of such light rays that make up the horizon, assuming that they don't converge. Since nothing can escape from a classical black hole, the number of the light rays can't decrease; and Hawking's geometric argument showed that they can't converge. Putting those two things together establishes that the horizon area can't decrease.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you very much for putting this in a simple way!
 
stevebd1 said:
the BH's event horizon area can remain stable in classical mechanics but will increase 1) if mass is added or 2) if spin or charge are reduced)

Or if spin or charge are *increased*. (The mass of a classical BH can't be reduced, so we don't have to consider that option.)
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top