Why Does Time Remain Constant on Any Chord in Galileo's Circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dinkadink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the time taken for a bead to slide down any chord of a circle remains constant, regardless of the chord's position. Participants suggest starting by analyzing the relationship between the length and height of the chord, akin to calculating the time for a ramp. The use of trigonometric identities, specifically sin(theta/2), is recommended for solving the problem. The problem is noted as intriguing and encourages further exploration of the underlying physics principles. Understanding this phenomenon highlights the consistent nature of gravitational acceleration along different paths in a circular motion context.
dinkadink
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why is it that if you have a circle. If you put any rod from the top center of the circle to any other point on the circle (this would be defined as a chord), then why, if the bead starts at the top, is the time required to slide down any chord independent of the particular chord chosen?

I have no idea how to even start this... any tips would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know how to find the time taken to slide down any given ramp, given length and height of the ramp, right? So write that down. Now put in the relation between length and height if the ramp is a chord on the circle.
 
What a nice problem -- I'd never heard of this one before! I'll just chime into say that you may find the trig identity for sin(theta/2) useful near the end...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top