Why Does Water Stick to Your Clothes?

AI Thread Summary
Water adheres to clothing due to the interplay of surface tension and the electric charges present in both water and fabric fibers. The orientation of charge groups in materials determines their wetting properties, with hydrophilic materials attracting water and hydrophobic materials allowing it to bead up and roll off. Unlike magnetism, this phenomenon is based on electric charges, where similar charges repel and opposite charges attract. The structure of the fabric can trap water between fibers, preventing it from simply falling off. Understanding these principles clarifies why clothes retain water after exposure.
Jake
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
So this question popped up randomly to me for no reason: water seems to stick to clothing, but I was wondering why this is, since to me it seems it should just fall right off the clothes meaning you'd never have to dry them :wink:

I suppose mabye it has to do with surface tension, mabye the water between two fibers has enough surface tension to keep it in place? But still, why wouldn't it fall without breaking its shape?

Thanks for any help :smile: :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Surface tension will keep things from getting wet.
For example you can "float" a needle in a glass of water.

If a material will get wet depends on the orientation of charge groups on the molecules that make up the material. (hydrophobic hydrophilic)
Some material will not get wet and you can indeed just shake the water off.
 
So in other words it's magnetic attraction that causes water to stick?

What does "orientation of charge groups mean", I'm a layman :P

Thanks, still trying to figure this whole thing out.
 
Jake said:
So in other words it's magnetic attraction that causes water to stick?

What does "orientation of charge groups mean", I'm a layman :P

Thanks, still trying to figure this whole thing out.
Magnetism is not involved.
It is electric charge, something like walking across the carpet and getting zapped by touching something metal.
Very simply many molecules have an electric charge with + side and a - side.
They can get locked into arrays that predominantly present one charge or the other at the surface.
Water has a predominant exposed charge also.
Equivalent charges repel each other, opposite charges attract.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top