Why Doesn't the Foucault Pendulum's Oscillation Plane Rotate with Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cepheid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Foucault Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The Foucault Pendulum's plane of oscillation remains unchanged despite the Earth's rotation because no external forces act to alter it. The pendulum's support structure rotates with the Earth, but the forces acting on the pendulum remain parallel to its oscillation plane. This results in minimal torque being applied to the pendulum system, as the lever arm is nearly zero. While the pendulum's bob rotates around the vertical axis, the plane of motion itself does not rotate. Thus, the pendulum effectively demonstrates the Earth's rotation without its oscillation plane being affected.
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
Can somebody explain to me why it doesn't matter that whatever structure from which a Foucault Pendulum is suspended is also rotating along with the Earth? How come the pendulum's plane of oscillation is not altered?

Wikipedia sort of has an answer, but to me it seems to amount to little more than a claim that it doesn't matter:

No forces act to make the plane of oscillation of the pendulum rotate - the plane contains the plumb line, so the force acting on the pendulum is parallel to the plane of oscillation at all times.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pendulum's support can't put a very large torque on the swinging pendulum system, as the lever arm is almost zero.
 
Note that the ball will rotate. It's just the plane of motion that doesn't rotate.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top