Why Don't Singularities Instantly Suck Everything In?

uknova
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have an interest in physics, I have not studied it at any high levels (as u will soon find out :smile: ), i just like to read and think about it, but I have a question, please don't blind me with maths!

If a singularity at a black hole has infinity density, I'm guessing this means it has infinite gravity. If someone has infinite gravity, won't everything in the universe get sucked into it instantaneously? Why does this not happen?

Sorry if my question sounded a bit dumb, which i guess it probably did!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uknova said:
If a singularity at a black hole has infinity density, I'm guessing this means it has infinite gravity. If someone has infinite gravity, won't everything in the universe get sucked into it instantaneously? Why does this not happen?
The answer is that it doesn't have infinite gravity, gravity is based on total mass rather than density, and the mass of the singularity is not infinite. For example, if the sun were replaced by a black hole of equal mass, the gravitational pull felt by the Earth wouldn't change, so it would remain in the same orbit.
 
how does something that has no size have a finite mass ?
 
uknova said:
how does something that has no size have a finite mass ?
mass doesn't really have anything to do with size, except in the sense that normally mass = density*volume...but obviously this formula breaks down when the density is infinite and the volume is zero, infinity times zero doesn't have a well-defined answer. But obviously if you keep cutting the volume in half while doubling the density, the mass will stay constant, and that's basically what's going on when the matter in a star is being compressed into a singularity.
 
Last edited:
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top