Why is positronium unstable compared to the stable hydrogen atom?

StateOfTheEqn
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the stability of positronium.

Positronium consists of an electron and a positron whereas hydrogen consists of an electron and a proton. The energy levels of positronium, ignoring fine structure, are -6.8eV/n2 whereas those for hydrogen are -13.6eV/n2.

My question is, why is positronium unstable resulting in the annihilation of the positron-electron pair while hydrogen is stable? Why does positronium not simply remain in its lowest energy level -6.8eV?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StateOfTheEqn said:
I have a question about the stability of positronium.

Positronium consists of an electron and a positron whereas hydrogen consists of an electron and a proton. The energy levels of positronium, ignoring fine structure, are -6.8eV/n2 whereas those for hydrogen are -13.6eV/n2.

My question is, why is positronium unstable resulting in the annihilation of the positron-electron pair while hydrogen is stable? Why does positronium not simply remain in its lowest energy level -6.8eV?

Because the ground state wavefunction has non-zero probability density at the nucleus. So there is always a finite change that the electron and positron will come close enough together to annihilate.

EDIT: Of course which particle you consider the "nucleus" is arbitrary in positronium, since both have identical masses. However their respective wavefunctions still overlap, which provides non-zero probability of annihilation.
 
Last edited:
There is one interesting factor prolonging the life of positronium. If the spins are in the same direction, they can't end up as 2 photons, since the spins of the positron and electron add up to 1, while 2 photons must have an even number for total spin.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top