I Why is Scalar Massless Wave Equation Conformally Invariant?

user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
I wish to gain a physical intuitive understanding as to why the scalar massless wave equation is conformally invariant.
It can be shown mathematically that the scalar massless wave equation is conformally invariant. However, doing so is rather tedious and muted in terms of physical understanding. As such, is there a physically intuitive explanation as to why the scalar massless wave equation is conformally invariant?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easier seen in energy-momentum representation, i.e., with
$$\phi(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 p \exp(-\mathrm{i} p_{\mu} x^{\mu}) \tilde{\phi}(p)$$
the solution of the massless wave equation implies that ##p_{\mu} p^{\mu}=0##, i.e., ##p^{\mu}## must be light-like.

Obviously the equation is invariant under the Poincare group, i.e., under Lorentz boosts, rotations and translations, but here you only need to preserve the light cone in momentum space not the Minkowski product between all vectors. So besides the Lorentz boosts and rotations (building together the proper orthochronous Lorentz). The corresponding symmetry group mapping light cones to themselves is larger, and that's the conformal group. Wikipedia gives a nice introduction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_symmetry
 
Thomas1 said:
is there a physically intuitive explanation as to why the scalar massless wave equation is conformally invariant?
One way to look at it is that a massless field does not have any built-in scale of energy or length; waves of the field of all possible frequencies/wavelengths are possible and "look the same" from the standpoint of the physics of how they propagate. The only invariant about the propagation of the waves is the light cones. So the invariance property you would expect the wave equation to have is the one that only preserves the light cones, i.e., conformal invariance.

A massive field, by contrast, has a built-in energy/length scale, given by its invariant mass. So you would expect its wave equation to only be invariant under the more restricted group of transformations that preserves, not just the light cones, but the invariant mass, i.e., the Poincare group.
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen and vanhees71
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top