Why Is the Hermiticity of the Density Operator Important in Quantum Mechanics?

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there,
In all text of QM I have, they tells that the density operator is hermitian. But without considering the math, from the physics base, why density operator must be hermitian? What's the physical significane of the eigenvalue of density matrix?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eigenvalues of the density matrix are probabilities. They clearly must be real, which is why the matrix must be hermitian. (In addition, they also must be non-negative and not larger than 1.)
 
Demystifier said:
Eigenvalues of the density matrix are probabilities. They clearly must be real, which is why the matrix must be hermitian. (In addition, they also must be non-negative and not larger than 1.)

Thanks. So before diagonalization, the diagonal elements of density matrix don't tell anything , right?
 
Well, I understand now how the diagonalized density matrix works. But for the following case how do I use it? For example, I have a two-level system without interaction, and hamiltonian gives

H|\Psi_n\rangle = \hbar\omega_n |\Psi_n\rangle

Now I consider the Heisenberg equation of the density operator

\dot{\rho} = -\frac{i}{\hbar}[H,\rho]

to findout the element of \dot{\rho}_{nm}, I apply an eigenstate of H on both side

\dot{\rho}|\Psi_i\rangle = -\frac{i}{\hbar}(H\rho - \rho H)|\Psi_i\rangle<br /> = -\frac{i}{\hbar}(H-\omega_i)\rho|\Psi_i\rangle<br />

So, what is \rho|\Psi_i\rangle? In the text, it gives

\dot{\rho}_{nm} = -i\omega_{nm}\rho_{nm} ?
 
Demystifier said:
Eigenvalues of the density matrix are probabilities. They clearly must be real, which is why the matrix must be hermitian. (In addition, they also must be non-negative and not larger than 1.)

Real eigenvalues does not imply hermiticity - for example, look at "[URL Hermiticity of the density matrix follows from its definition, which is

<br /> \rho := \sum_k p_k |\psi_k\rangle\langle\psi_k|<br />

where p_k is the probability that system will be found in the state \psi_k (states \psi_k can be arbitrary possible states of the system).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top