I Why is the Kinetic Energy Operator Differentiated Twice Instead of Squared?

Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
When I learned about operators, I learned <x> = ∫ Ψ* x Ψ dx, <p> = ∫ Ψ* (ħ/i ∂/∂x) Ψ dx. The book then told me the kinetic energy operator

T = p2/2m = -ħ2/2m (∂2/∂x2)
I am just think that why isn't it -ħ2/2m (∂/∂x)2
Put in other words, why isn't it the square of the derivative, but differentiating it twice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chan Pok Fung said:
When I learned about operators, I learned <x> = ∫ Ψ* x Ψ dx, <p> = ∫ Ψ* (ħ/i ∂/∂x) Ψ dx. The book then told me the kinetic energy operator

T = p2/2m = -ħ2/2m (∂2/∂x2)
I am just think that why isn't it -ħ2/2m (∂/∂x)2
Put in other words, why isn't it the square of the derivative, but differentiating it twice?
They're just different notations for the same thing: the 2nd derivative is the square of the 1st derivative.
Cf. 2nd derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes Mayan Fung
As the name suggests operators operate on the Hilbert space vectors. They are linear operators mapping ##|\psi \rangle \in \mathcal{H}## to another vector ##\hat{A} |\psi \rangle \in \mathcal{H}##. By definition the product of two operators is the composition of these operations, i.e., ##\hat{B} \hat{A}|\psi \rangle## first maps ##|\psi \rangle## to ##\hat{A} |\psi \rangle## and then this vector to ##\hat{B}(\hat{A} |\psi \rangle)=\hat{B} \hat{A} |\psi \rangle##. Thus ##\partial_x^2=\partial_x \partial_x## applied to a position-space wave function means. You first take the derivative of the wave function and then take the derivative of the result again, i.e., you take the 2nd derivative of the wave function. Then the usual notation is
$$\left (\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right)^2=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Mayan Fung
Thanks all!
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Back
Top