Why is the universe's expansion accelerating despite gravitational forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeeJeffries
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Inflation
LeeJeffries
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I say inflation, I might possibly not mean it. I've read that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, and it's a mystery why, but my question is why isn't it expected to appear that way?

If the masses of galaxies are spiralling towards the center where gravity is highest, and as more mass moves towards the center, space-time becomes more and more warped quicker and quicker as gravity increases, why wouldn't the space-time between galaxies curve quicker and quicker, redshifting the light?

In my head I picture it as the back of a chesterfield sofa, where galaxies are the studs and space-time is the leather inbetween

Where have I gone wrong? I admit "dark energy" just seems too stretched of an idea for me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean the universe is expanding. Inflation was the very brief theoretical period in the big bang model right after the big bang when things got much bigger really,really fast...briefly faster than the speed of light.

Everywhere we look, more distant galaxies are receding at greater speeds than closer ones. Nobody knows why for sure but Einstein's equations suggest, despite Einstein's initial interpretation that things "just had to be stable", that the universe should be expanding or contracting. As you point out, it was discovered that not only is the universe expanding but is doing so at an accelerating rate.

As far as is known, the universe is quite isotropic and uniform over vast distances, NOT curved, but flat or very close to flat. In other words, there do not seem to be concentrations of mass or energy so vast as to curve much of the universe except locally, as perhaps within a galaxy or a massive black hole. Spacetime "between galaxies" would be some of the least curved as there isn't much there to curve it.

You can find more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_universe

and maybe try "cosmological constant" if you are interested.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top