Why is there a change in trend for pKb for n-butylamine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cncbmb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the pKb values of various organic bases, specifically amines, and the observed trend of decreasing pKb with longer alkyl chains. However, a notable anomaly occurs with n-Butylamine (CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2), where the pKb value increases to 3.39, which contradicts the expected trend. This discrepancy is further complicated by conflicting pKb values found on different websites, with one source listing n-Butylamine's pKb as 10.78 at 20 degrees Celsius. The conversation suggests that the differences in pKb values may stem from errors in labeling pKa values as pKb and highlights the complexities of accurately predicting pKa/pKb values due to factors like solvation effects and entropy, which influence the measurements beyond simple protonation/deprotonation energies.
cncbmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I read that pKb for the organic bases below generally decreases as the alkyl chain gets longer:

http://www.chemguide.co.uk/basicorg/acidbase/bases.html#top
pKb
CH3NH2 3.36
CH3CH2NH2 3.27
CH3CH2CH2NH2 3.16
CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2 3.39

Why does the pattern break for CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2?

Why is that we find such a different pKb number when we search "n-Butylamine" on this website? http://www.sanderkok.com/techniques/laboratory/pka_pkb.html (it says pKb=10.78 for 20 degrees C which is much different than 3.39 on chemguide.co.uk)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
cncbmb said:
Why is that we find such a different pKb number when we search "n-Butylamine" on this website? http://www.sanderkok.com/techniques/laboratory/pka_pkb.html (it says pKb=10.78 for 20 degrees C which is much different than 3.39 on chemguide.co.uk)

Because they are idiots that list pKa values naming them pKb.
 
pKb
CH3NH2 3.36
CH3CH2NH2 3.27
CH3CH2CH2NH2 3.16
CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2 3.39

Why does the pattern break for CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2?
 
cncbmb said:
Why does the pattern break for CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2?

No simple reason I'd suspect. The differences are fairly small, and exact pKa/b values are notoriously difficult to predict theoretically.

Put it this way: the enthalpy \Delta H of protonation/deprotonation for a single molecule in vacuum probably does follow a fairly regular trend there. But the pKa/pKb values include the solvation effects, entropy and all that, and does so relative the auto-dissociation of water. So pK values are actually a bit more complicated and unpredictable than they might appear from simply thinking in terms of the protonation/deprotonation energy.
 
Thanks.
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top